If you are a water utility spending heavily on pesticide and nitrate removal from raw water — this project developed an interactive water quality viewer and governance models tested across 7 EU case studies that help you shift from expensive end-of-pipe treatment to coordinated upstream pollution prevention with farmers and local authorities. The tools include GIS-based predictive models that show where contamination risk is highest in your catchment area.
Water Quality Monitoring and Governance Tools to Cut Drinking Water Treatment Costs
Imagine farmers spraying pesticides and fertilizers that slowly seep into the same rivers and wells your tap water comes from. Right now, water companies just pay more to filter all that out — but what if you could stop the pollution upstream instead? WATERPROTECT built monitoring tools and cooperation models across 7 real locations in Europe so that farmers, water companies, and local governments can work together to keep water clean at the source. Think of it like a neighborhood watch, but for water quality — everyone sees the data, everyone shares responsibility.
What needed solving
Agriculture is the largest source of pesticide and nitrate contamination in Europe's drinking water sources. Water companies currently bear the full cost of removing these pollutants through expensive treatment processes, while farmers and local authorities lack the data and coordination tools to prevent pollution upstream. There is no widely adopted system that lets all parties see water quality data in real time and share responsibility for keeping sources clean.
What was built
The project produced 31 deliverables including an interactive water quality viewer software module populated with site-specific data from 7 case studies, spatially explicit GIS analyses and predictive models for water contamination, cost-efficiency analyses for mitigation measures, and new water governance models that shift focus from treatment costs to rewarding clean farming practices.
Who needs this
Who can put this to work
If you are a farming advisory service helping growers comply with water protection regulations — this project created participatory methods and cost-efficiency analyses tested with farmers associations across 9 countries. The tools help you demonstrate to your clients that adopting better land management practices can qualify them for reward-based water governance schemes rather than facing regulatory penalties.
If you are an environmental consultancy advising municipalities or water boards on catchment management — this project delivered spatially explicit GIS analyses and predictive models covering different soil-climate conditions, farming systems, and legal contexts across 7 case studies. These ready-to-adapt tools let you offer data-driven water source protection plans instead of generic compliance checklists.
Quick answers
What would it cost to implement these water protection tools?
The project data does not include specific licensing or implementation costs. The tools were developed under EU public funding (RIA scheme), which typically means outputs are available under open or favorable licensing terms. Contact the coordinator at VITO (Belgium) for current access conditions.
Can these tools scale to large water catchment areas?
The tools were tested across 7 case studies covering different sizes of water collection areas, different soil-climate conditions, and different farming systems across 9 EU countries. This range of testing conditions suggests the approach is designed to scale from smaller local catchments to larger regional water supply zones.
What about intellectual property and licensing?
As a publicly funded Research and Innovation Action, core outputs are typically available for broad use. The interactive water quality viewer software and GIS models were developed by a 28-partner consortium led by VITO. Specific IP arrangements should be clarified directly with the coordinator.
Does this comply with EU water regulations?
The project was specifically designed around EU water policy, investigating governance models that go beyond current regulatory requirements. The cost-benefit analyses and participatory methods were built to align with both existing drinking water directives and emerging water quality standards.
How long does implementation take?
The project ran from June 2017 to September 2020, producing 31 deliverables including the interactive water quality viewer populated with site-specific data. Adapting the tools to a new catchment area would require local data integration, but the methodology is documented across all 7 case studies.
Can these tools integrate with existing water monitoring systems?
The interactive water quality viewer was designed as a software module that can be populated with site-specific data. The GIS-based predictive models use spatial data that can interface with standard environmental monitoring platforms. The EuroSciVoc classification includes mobile phone integration for field data collection.
Who built it
The 28-partner consortium spans 9 countries (BE, DK, ES, IE, IT, NL, PL, RO, UK) with a balanced mix of 6 universities, 6 research organizations, and 5 industry partners. The 18% industry ratio is moderate, and only 2 SMEs participated, which means the project was primarily research-driven rather than market-driven. However, the 11 "other" partners likely include water utilities, farmers associations, and public bodies — the actual end-users of these tools. The coordinator, VITO (Flemish Institute for Technological Research), is a well-established Belgian research organization with strong ties to environmental industry. For a business looking to adopt these tools, VITO is the entry point, but the real implementation knowledge sits with the case study leaders across all 9 countries.
- VLAAMSE INSTELLING VOOR TECHNOLOGISCH ONDERZOEK N.V.Coordinator · BE
- VLAAMSE MILIEUMAATSCHAPPIJparticipant · BE
- INAGRO, PROVINCIAAL EXTERN VERZELFSTANDIGD AGENTSCHAP IN PRIVAATRECHTELIJKE VORM VZWparticipant · BE
- AIGUES DE BARCELONA, EMPRESA METROPOLITANA DE GESTIO DEL CICLE INTEGRAL DE L'AIGUA SAparticipant · ES
- VLAAMSE MAATSCHAPPIJ VOOR WATERVOORZIENINGparticipant · BE
- UNIVERSITATEA TEHNICA CLUJ-NAPOCAparticipant · RO
- KOBENHAVNS UNIVERSITETparticipant · DK
- AGENCIA ESTATAL CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICASparticipant · ES
- EIGEN VERMOGEN VAN HET INSTITUUT VOOR LANDBOUW- EN VISSERIJONDERZOEKparticipant · BE
- TEAGASC - AGRICULTURE AND FOOD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYparticipant · IE
- Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenlandparticipant · DK
- PANSTWOWY INSTYTUT GEOLOGICZNY - PANSTWOWY INSTYTUT BADAWCZYparticipant · PL
- AGENZIA REGIONALE PER LA PREVENZIONE, L'AMBIENTE E L'ENERGIA DELL'EMILIA-ROMAGNAparticipant · IT
- TIRLÁN LIMITEDparticipant · IE
- UNIVERSITA CATTOLICA DEL SACRO CUOREparticipant · IT
- UNIVERSITY OF ULSTERparticipant · UK
- ZACHODNIOPOMORSKI UNIWERSYTET TECHNOLOGICZNY W SZCZECINIEparticipant · PL
VITO (Vlaamse Instelling voor Technologisch Onderzoek), Belgium — the lead research organization coordinating the 28-partner consortium
Talk to the team behind this work.
Want to connect with the WATERPROTECT team? SciTransfer can arrange an introduction to the right consortium partner for your specific water quality challenge.