If you are a manufacturer of emergency response gear dealing with the lack of rapid field-diagnostic tools for chemical incidents — this project developed prototype diagnostic systems that assess toxic exposure non-invasively using breath, skin, and saliva samples. The system was validated in 2 field exercises and clinical trials at poisoning clinics, offering a ready-to-license product line for CBRN response kits.
Rapid Toxic Emergency Triage System Using Portable Sensors and AI
Imagine a chemical spill or a terrorist attack with toxic substances — first responders arrive but have no quick way to tell who's been seriously exposed and who hasn't. TOXI-triage built portable devices that can read breath, skin, and saliva samples on the spot, like a breathalyzer but for toxic injuries. The system also uses drones and AI to map the danger zone and track every casualty from the scene to the hospital. They tested everything in 2 field exercises and real poisoning clinics to make sure it actually works under pressure.
What needed solving
When a toxic chemical incident happens — whether industrial accident, terrorist attack, or environmental disaster — first responders currently lack fast, reliable tools to determine who has been seriously exposed and who is safe. Traditional lab testing takes hours or days, while casualties need immediate triage. This gap costs lives and wastes critical medical resources on people who may not need urgent care.
What was built
The project built two key prototype systems: a diagnostic system that assesses toxic exposure and injury using metabolic markers, tested on patients exposed to OP pesticides, toxic alcohol adulterants, and radiation; and a non-invasive sampling system with breath, skin, and saliva collection devices along with standard operating procedures. These were integrated with drones, standoff detectors, AI-powered sensor processing, and a wireless casualty tracking system.
Who needs this
Who can put this to work
If you are a chemical plant operator dealing with workplace exposure monitoring and incident response — this project built non-invasive sampling devices that detect metabolic markers of toxic injury in seconds. With 21 partners across 8 countries validating the technology, these tools can be integrated into your on-site safety protocols to rapidly triage affected workers during chemical spills or leaks.
If you are a defense contractor looking for next-generation CBRN detection capabilities — this project integrated drones, standoff detectors, AI-driven sensor processing, and wireless casualty tracking into a unified command-and-control system. The 2 field exercises proved operational readiness, and the aptamer-based biosensing technology offers a differentiated edge over existing detection methods.
Quick answers
What would it cost to license or acquire this technology?
The project produced prototype diagnostic and sampling systems through an Innovation Action with 21 partners. Licensing terms would need to be negotiated with the coordinator (Loughborough University) and the relevant technology-developing partners. With 6 SMEs in the consortium, some components may already have commercial pricing structures.
Can this scale to industrial or national deployment?
The system was tested in 2 field exercises and clinical trials at poisoning clinics, including live agent tests at UN OPCW-designated laboratories. With 7 industry partners and 8 countries represented in the consortium, the technology was designed with operational deployment in mind. Scaling would require manufacturing partnerships for the hardware components.
What is the IP situation and who owns the technology?
IP is distributed across 21 consortium partners under Horizon 2020 rules, meaning each partner typically owns the IP they generated. Key technologies include aptamer-based biosensing, non-invasive sampling devices, and AI-driven sensor processing. Licensing discussions should start with Loughborough University as coordinator.
Has this been tested in real emergency conditions?
Yes — 2 field exercises were conducted to test and verify operational attributes. Additionally, clinical trials were run in poisoning clinics with real patients exposed to OP pesticides, toxic alcohol adulterants, and radiation. Live agent tests were conducted in laboratories designated by the UN's OPCW.
How does this integrate with existing emergency response systems?
The project was built around a casualty-to-discharge integration concept, with wireless traceability providing dynamic mapping including medical care tracking. The centralized command-and-control architecture was designed to overlay existing response infrastructure with embedded sensors, drones, and standoff detectors.
Is this only for CBRN events or does it have everyday uses?
The project explicitly designed for multiple uses beyond CBRN. Based on the project objectives, outcomes are intended for routine use in medical, environmental, urban, and search-and-rescue emergencies. This multi-use design was a deliberate strategy to ensure economic sustainability of the systems.
What regulatory approvals exist?
The diagnostic and sampling prototypes were tested in clinical trials and OPCW-designated labs, which provides a strong evidence base. However, based on available project data, full regulatory approval for medical devices (e.g., CE marking) would likely still need to be pursued for commercial deployment.
Who built it
TOXI-triage assembled a strong consortium of 21 partners across 8 countries, with a balanced mix of 8 universities, 7 industry players, 2 research organizations, and 4 other entities. The 33% industry ratio and 6 SMEs signal genuine commercial intent — this wasn't purely academic. Loughborough University (UK) coordinated the effort, bringing together expertise from the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, Spain, Finland, the Netherlands, Norway, and the UK. The geographic spread across Northern, Western, and Southern Europe suggests the technology was tested across different regulatory and operational environments. For a business partner looking to license or deploy these systems, the presence of 7 industry partners means there are likely manufacturing-ready partners already familiar with the technology.
- LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITYCoordinator · UK
- MIKKELIN KEHITYSYHTIO MIKSEI OYthirdparty · FI
- HELSINGIN YLIOPISTOparticipant · FI
- AIRSENSE ANALYTICS GMBHparticipant · DE
- PROMETECH BVparticipant · NL
- HASICSKY ZACHRANNY SBOR MORAVSKOSLEZSKEHO KRAJEparticipant · CZ
- ETHNICON METSOVION POLYTECHNIONparticipant · EL
- HELMHOLTZ-ZENTRUM FUR UMWELTFORSCHUNG GMBH - UFZparticipant · DE
- JYVASKYLAN YLIOPISTOparticipant · FI
- OSLO UNIVERSITETSSYKEHUS HFparticipant · NO
- ATOS SPAIN SAparticipant · ES
- ENVIRONICS OYparticipant · FI
- LOTHIAN HEALTH BOARDthirdparty · UK
- T4I ENGINEERING IKE*T4I ENGINEERING PRIVATE COMPANYparticipant · EL
- T4I ENGINEERING LTDparticipant · UK
- YPOURGEIO ETHNIKIS AMYNASparticipant · EL
- MIKKELIN KAUPUNKIparticipant · FI
- THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGHparticipant · UK
- UNIVERSITAET PADERBORNparticipant · DE
- G.A.S. GESELLSCHAFT FUR ANALYTISCHESENSORSYSTEME M.B.H.participant · DE
- GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITAET HANNOVERparticipant · DE
Loughborough University, UK — contact through university research office or project website
Talk to the team behind this work.
SciTransfer can connect you directly with the TOXI-triage team and help negotiate access to their prototype diagnostic and sampling technologies. We handle the introductions so you can focus on evaluating the fit.