If you are a shipping company routing vessels through Arctic corridors and dealing with unpredictable multi-year ice floes drifting into your lanes — this project developed satellite-based detection tools that identify hazardous thick ice and ridged regions from radar and microwave data. The weekly-updated sea ice thickness products from CryoSat-2 can feed directly into route planning systems, helping you avoid costly detours or hull damage. With 14 research partners across 8 countries validating these methods, the underlying science is robust.
Satellite-Based Sea Ice Hazard Detection for Safer Arctic Shipping and Offshore Operations
Imagine you're driving a ship through the Arctic and your GPS only tells you "there's ice somewhere ahead" — not very helpful, right? SPICES built smarter satellite tools that can spot the really dangerous ice: thick multi-year chunks that can crush a hull, heavily ridged areas, and zones where ice is melting unpredictably. Think of it as a weather forecast, but specifically for ice hazards, updated weekly and covering the entire Arctic at 12-15 km resolution. The goal is to warn polar operators before they sail into trouble they weren't designed to handle.
What needed solving
Arctic shipping routes are opening up due to climate change, and offshore energy exploration is pushing further north — but severe ice hazards still exist and can appear unexpectedly. Current satellite monitoring tells operators where ice is, but not where the dangerous ice is: the multi-year floes that can crush hulls, the ridged zones that trap vessels, and the regional anomalies where ice is far thicker than expected. Operators need specific hazard warnings, not just general ice maps.
What was built
The project built satellite data retrieval tools that detect specific sea ice hazards — multi-year ice floes, heavily ridged zones, and thickness anomalies — from radar, altimeter, and passive microwave satellite data. Concrete outputs include gridded Arctic-wide sea ice thickness maps at 12-15 km resolution, weekly CryoSat-2 thickness products, an optimal estimation tool for computing snow and ice parameters, forward models for predicting satellite signatures along ice drift paths, and a methodology for retrieving WMO ice classes from radar altimeter data.
Who needs this
Who can put this to work
If you are an offshore operator managing seasonal platforms in Arctic waters and worrying about extreme ice events that exceed your structural design limits — this project built automated sea ice warning products that detect exactly those conditions. The gridded sea ice thickness maps at 12-15 km resolution from SMOS and SMAP satellites can alert you to regional anomalies of unusually thick ice approaching your operations. This means earlier evacuation decisions and better seasonal planning for drilling windows.
If you are an insurer pricing risk for Arctic shipping routes or offshore installations and struggling with sparse ice hazard data — this project produced validated datasets and retrieval tools that quantify sea ice thickness, type, and extremes from multiple satellite sources. The 42 deliverables include sea ice freeboard and thickness products with uncertainty estimates, giving you actual data to model risk rather than relying on historical averages that climate change has made unreliable.
Quick answers
What would it cost to access or license these sea ice products?
The project was publicly funded with EUR 2,995,678 from the EU under a Research and Innovation Action. The tools and algorithms were developed by public research institutions, so licensing terms would need to be negotiated directly with the coordinator (Finnish Meteorological Institute). As an RIA project, results may be available under open or preferential terms for European operators.
Can these tools work at the scale needed for commercial Arctic operations?
Yes, the project delivered Arctic-wide coverage products. The gridded sea ice thickness products from SMOS and SMAP cover the full Arctic at 12-15 km resolution, and the CryoSat-2 products provide weekly updates. These are designed to feed into operational ice charting and prediction systems, not just small research areas.
Who owns the intellectual property from this project?
The consortium of 14 partners across 8 countries developed these tools, with the Finnish Meteorological Institute (ILMATIETEEN LAITOS) as coordinator. IP ownership follows Horizon 2020 rules where each partner owns their contributions. Any commercial licensing would need to go through the relevant partner institutions.
How does this compare to existing ice monitoring services?
Based on the project objective, traditional automatic remote sensing products only provide general information like ice extent and concentration. SPICES specifically addresses the gap in detecting hazardous extremes: multi-year ice floes, heavily ridged regions, and anomalously thick or thin ice — the conditions that actually damage ships and platforms.
Is this ready to plug into our existing navigation or operations systems?
The project produced demonstration-level tools and datasets in standard NetCDF format, which is compatible with most geospatial and maritime systems. However, with 0% industry participation in the consortium (all 14 partners are universities or research institutes), integration into commercial operational systems would require additional engineering work.
What satellite data does this depend on, and is it still available?
The tools use data from ESA's SMOS satellite, NASA's SMAP, CryoSat-2, and synthetic aperture radar missions. These are operational satellite programs with ongoing data streams. The methods were designed to work with existing and imminent satellite sensors, so the underlying data supply remains available.
Are there regulatory drivers that make this relevant?
The IMO Polar Code, which entered force in 2017 during the project period, requires ships operating in polar waters to have adequate ice information for safe navigation. These ice hazard warning products directly support Polar Code compliance by providing the detailed ice type and thickness information that general concentration maps cannot deliver.
Who built it
The SPICES consortium is a heavyweight research alliance — 14 partners across 8 countries (Germany, Denmark, Finland, France, Italy, Norway, Turkey, UK) — but it is entirely composed of universities and research institutes with zero industry partners. The coordinator is the Finnish Meteorological Institute, Finland's national weather and climate authority, which gives strong credibility for Arctic monitoring but no built-in commercial pathway. For a business looking to use these results, this means the science is solid (EUR 2,995,678 in EU funding, 42 deliverables) but you would need to bring your own integration and productization capability. There is no existing commercial partner to fast-track deployment.
- ILMATIETEEN LAITOSCoordinator · FI
- DANMARKS METEOROLOGISKE INSTITUTparticipant · DK
- UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURGparticipant · DE
- ISTANBUL TEKNIK UNIVERSITESIparticipant · TR
- ALFRED-WEGENER-INSTITUT HELMHOLTZ-ZENTRUM FUR POLAR- UND MEERESFORSCHUNGparticipant · DE
- UNIVERSITAET BREMENparticipant · DE
- CONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHEparticipant · IT
- STIFTELSEN NANSEN SENTER FOR MILJOOG FJERNMALINGparticipant · NO
- EUROPEAN CENTRE FOR MEDIUM-RANGE WEATHER FORECASTSparticipant · UK
- DANMARKS TEKNISKE UNIVERSITETparticipant · DK
- INSTITUT FRANCAIS DE RECHERCHE POUR L'EXPLOITATION DE LA MERparticipant · FR
- METEOROLOGISK INSTITUTTparticipant · NO
- UNIVERSITA POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHEparticipant · IT
- MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FORDERUNG DER WISSENSCHAFTEN EVparticipant · DE
Finnish Meteorological Institute (ILMATIETEEN LAITOS), Finland — the national meteorological authority
Talk to the team behind this work.
SciTransfer can connect you with the SPICES research team to discuss licensing their sea ice detection tools and datasets for your Arctic operations. We handle the introduction so you get straight to the technical conversation.