If you are a law firm dealing with complex deportation cases — this project developed an analysis of 6 alternative policies that provide legal pathways for clients. This helps in identifying viable defense strategies based on existing EU and UK precedents.
Analyzing Migration Policy Effectiveness and Alternatives to Deportation Systems
Imagine trying to fix a leaky pipe by just pushing the water back, but it never actually stops leaking. This research looks at why current deportation rules aren't working and how they affect people's lives. It searches for better, more dignified ways to handle paperwork issues for migrants instead of just sending them away.
What needed solving
Current migration return policies are often ineffective and lead to human rights violations. There is a lack of evidence-based alternatives to handle administrative irregularity without relying on forced returns.
What was built
A database of public opinion surveys and a detailed analysis of 6 alternative migration policies.
Who needs this
Who can put this to work
If you are a city agency dealing with the social integration of irregular migrants — this project developed a database of public opinion and policy outcomes. This allows for better planning of local support services based on actual societal trends.
If you are a tech company dealing with government data visualization — this project developed a comprehensive database of public opinion surveys and regression analysis. This provides a blueprint for building tools that track how media and trust influence migration policy.
Quick answers
What is the cost or price for implementing these findings?
Based on available project data, there is no pricing information as this is a research grant project funded by the EU.
Can this be scaled to an industrial level?
Based on available project data, the project focuses on policy analysis and ethnographic fieldwork rather than an industrial product, so industrial scaling is not applicable.
Are there patents or licensing opportunities?
Based on available project data, no patents are mentioned; the outputs are research reports and databases.
How does this affect current migration regulations?
The project examines the Returns Directive and identifies 6 alternative policies to suggest more effective ways of handling administrative irregularity.
What is the timeline for the results?
The project runs from 2023-10-01 to 2027-02-28.
Who built it
The consortium is purely academic and research-driven, consisting of 11 partners across 9 countries. It is composed of 6 universities and 2 research organizations, with 3 other entities. There are 0 industry partners and 0 SMEs, indicating the project is focused on theoretical and policy evidence rather than commercial application.
Contact the Universitat de Barcelona research office regarding the MORE project.
Talk to the team behind this work.
Contact us to find out how to apply these policy insights to your legal or governmental operations.