If you are an EV manufacturer dealing with battery warranty claims and unpredictable cell degradation — this project developed a multi-sensor platform with 4 embedded physical sensors and 2 virtual sensors that provides real-time state-of-charge, health, power, energy, and safety indicators. With at least 12 cell prototypes tested across 2 EV use cases, this technology could reduce your safety margins and extend usable battery life.
Smart Sensors Inside Battery Cells Tell You Exactly When They'll Fail
Imagine your phone battery could talk and tell you exactly how it's feeling inside — not just "80% charged" but what's actually degrading and why. INSTABAT embedded tiny sensors directly inside lithium-ion battery cells, like putting a health monitor inside the battery's heart. These sensors measure temperature, pressure, strain, and chemical changes in real time, giving battery management systems far more accurate readings of charge, health, and safety. The result is batteries that last longer, charge smarter, and warn you before something goes wrong.
What needed solving
Battery manufacturers and EV companies currently rely on external measurements (voltage, current, surface temperature) to estimate what's happening inside battery cells — essentially guessing the internal state through indirect signals. This leads to oversized safety margins that waste capacity, unpredictable degradation that causes warranty failures, and inability to detect dangerous conditions like internal gas buildup until it's too late.
What was built
A proof-of-concept "lab-on-a-cell" multi-sensor platform: battery cells equipped with 4 types of embedded physical sensors (Fiber Bragg Grating optical fibers, luminescence probes, reference electrodes, photo-acoustic gas sensors) plus 2 virtual sensors, connected to enhanced BMS algorithms that deliver real-time state-of-charge, health, power, energy, and safety indicators. At least 12 cell prototypes and 12+ prototypes of each sensor type were manufactured and tested across 2 EV use cases.
Who needs this
Who can put this to work
If you are a battery cell manufacturer struggling with quality control and early-life failure detection — this project built at least 12 prototypes of each finalized sensor type designed for integration during cell manufacturing. The proof-of-concept includes a techno-economic feasibility study on manufacturability and adaptability to other cell technologies, giving you a realistic path to embedding smart sensing in your production line.
If you are a stationary storage operator facing unpredictable battery degradation and costly downtime — this project demonstrated enhanced BMS algorithms that correlate real-time sensor data with actual degradation phenomena inside cells. The platform monitors temperature, pressure, strain, lithium concentration, and CO2 — enabling predictive maintenance, second-life assessment, and reduced safety overhead across your battery fleet.
Quick answers
What would it cost to integrate these sensors into our battery cells?
The project included a techno-economic feasibility study covering manufacturability, but specific per-cell costs are not published in the available data. The sensor types used — Fiber Bragg Gratings, reference electrodes, luminescence probes, and photo-acoustic gas sensors — are established technologies, which suggests costs could be driven down at scale. Contact the consortium for feasibility study results.
Can this scale to high-volume battery production lines?
The project explicitly addressed manufacturability and adaptability to other cell technologies in its techno-economic feasibility study. With at least 12 cell prototypes and at least 12 prototypes of each sensor type produced, the consortium demonstrated repeatable manufacturing. However, full gigafactory-scale integration would require further engineering beyond this proof of concept.
Who owns the IP and can we license this technology?
The consortium of 10 partners across 4 countries (AT, DE, FR, PT) includes 5 industry partners. IP is likely shared among consortium members under the Horizon 2020 grant agreement. CEA (French Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission) coordinated the project. Licensing discussions would need to go through the relevant IP holders in the consortium.
Has this been tested in real electric vehicle conditions?
Yes. The project demonstrated improvement of cell functional performance and safety through 2 specific use cases for EV applications. The proof-of-concept multi-sensor platform was tested as a 'lab-on-a-cell' — a cell prototype equipped with physical and virtual sensors providing real-time state indicators.
What exactly do these sensors measure that current BMS cannot?
Current battery management systems estimate internal states from external voltage and current measurements. INSTABAT's 4 physical sensors directly measure temperature and heat flow, pressure, strain, lithium-ion concentration and distribution, and CO2 concentration inside the cell. Combined with 2 virtual sensors based on electrochemical and thermal models, this provides time- and space-resolved monitoring of what actually happens inside the cell.
Is this compatible with different battery chemistries and form factors?
The techno-economic feasibility study specifically addressed adaptability to other cell technologies beyond the project's primary Li-ion focus. Based on available project data, the sensor platform was designed with adaptability in mind, though specific chemistry compatibility results would need to be confirmed with the consortium.
What is the regulatory landscape for embedded battery sensors?
Battery regulations in the EU (particularly the EU Battery Regulation) are increasingly demanding better state-of-health tracking and digital battery passports. INSTABAT's in-cell sensing directly supports compliance with these emerging requirements by providing verified internal data rather than estimated parameters. This positions the technology well for upcoming regulatory mandates.
Who built it
The INSTABAT consortium brings together 10 partners from 4 countries (Austria, Germany, France, Portugal), with a strong 50% industry ratio — 5 industry partners alongside 3 universities and 2 research organizations. Coordinated by CEA, one of Europe's top energy research institutions, the project sits at the intersection of battery science and industrial application. The balanced mix of research and industry partners suggests the technology was developed with manufacturing realities in mind, not just lab curiosity. The involvement of partners from major European battery and automotive markets (France, Germany) adds commercial credibility. No SMEs participated, which indicates this is enterprise-grade technology targeting large-scale battery manufacturers rather than startup-stage innovation.
- COMMISSARIAT A L ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVESCoordinator · FR
- COLLEGE DE FRANCEthirdparty · FR
- INSTITUT NATIONAL DES SCIENCES APPLIQUEES DE LYONparticipant · FR
- INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AGparticipant · DE
- UNIVERSIDADE DE AVEIROparticipant · PT
- FAURECIA SYSTEMES D ECHAPPEMENT SASparticipant · FR
- VARTA INNOVATION GMBHparticipant · AT
- CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE CNRSparticipant · FR
- BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFTparticipant · DE
CEA (Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives), France — search for INSTABAT project coordinator at CEA for direct contact
Talk to the team behind this work.
Want to explore how INSTABAT's embedded battery sensing technology could improve your battery products or operations? SciTransfer can connect you directly with the research team and help evaluate fit for your specific use case.