If you are a GovTech consultancy helping local governments modernize their services — this project developed tested co-creation models from 9 pilots across 10 countries that show exactly how to engage citizens in redesigning public services. The final models and roadmap give you a ready-made methodology to offer clients, backed by real European case studies. You can license or adapt these approaches instead of building your own from scratch.
Proven Methods to Redesign Public Services by Involving Real Citizens at Scale
Imagine a city wants to improve its elder care or youth services, but the people designing those services never actually talk to the people using them. CoSIE ran 9 real-world experiments across 10 European countries where governments, citizens, and service providers sat down together — using tools like data analytics, online platforms, and community reporting — to redesign public services from scratch. Think of it like a restaurant letting its regulars help design the menu instead of guessing what they want. The result is a tested playbook and set of models that any public service organization can use to involve citizens in service design.
What needed solving
Public services — from elder care to youth programs — are designed by administrators who rarely consult the people actually using them. This leads to low uptake, wasted budgets, and services that miss real needs, especially for underserved communities. Municipalities know they should involve citizens but lack practical, tested methods to do so at scale.
What was built
The project produced a roadmap for co-creation of public services, initial/interim/final pilot models with architectural analysis, and practical resources for engaging citizens including hard-to-reach groups. It also established local trainer networks for sustained community dialogue across 9 pilot sites in 10 countries.
Who needs this
Who can put this to work
If you are a software company building platforms for social services or citizen engagement — this project tested how data analytics, Living Labs, and community reporting tools work in real public service settings across 9 pilots. The architectural analysis and interim models document what digital tools actually worked for gathering citizen input. You can use these validated requirements to build features your public sector clients are already asking for.
If you are a health or social care provider struggling to reach underserved populations — this project specifically targeted 'hard to reach' citizen groups and developed practical resources for engaging them in service co-design. The 9 pilots produced local trainer models embedded in community networks, giving you a sustainable way to keep citizen voices in your service planning long after the project ends.
Quick answers
What would it cost to implement these co-creation methods?
The project does not publish per-pilot costs or licensing fees for its models. However, the deliverables include a free roadmap and practical resources designed for reuse. Implementation costs would depend on your organization's size, the number of services being redesigned, and whether you need external facilitation support.
Can this scale beyond a single pilot city?
Yes — the project explicitly tested scalability by running 9 pilots across 10 countries (Estonia, Greece, Spain, Finland, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, UK) with very different public service contexts. The final models and architectural analysis were designed to capture cross-cutting lessons that transfer across settings.
Who owns the intellectual property — can we use these models?
CoSIE was funded as a Horizon 2020 Innovation Action, which typically means deliverables are publicly accessible. The roadmap for co-creation of public services and the final models were designed for broad adoption. Contact the coordinator at Turku University of Applied Sciences in Finland for specific licensing or reuse terms.
How long does it take to set up a co-creation pilot?
Based on the project timeline, CoSIE ran from December 2017 to May 2021 — roughly 3.5 years for 9 pilots including development of initial, interim, and final models. Individual pilots within the project would have been shorter, likely 12-18 months based on the phased deliverable structure.
Does this work with our existing digital infrastructure?
The project used a mix of open data, social media analytics, Living Lab platforms, and community reporting tools. The architectural analysis deliverable specifically documents how these components fit together. Based on available project data, the approach is designed to complement existing systems rather than replace them.
Is there ongoing support or training available?
One of CoSIE's 6 objectives was sustainability through establishing local trainers for animating dialogue and collating citizen input, embedded in community networks. This means the project built a train-the-trainer model rather than depending on external consultants indefinitely.
What regulations does this help us comply with?
While CoSIE doesn't target specific regulations, it directly supports EU directives on citizen participation, open government, and inclusive public service delivery. The democratic dimensions and social inclusion focus aligns with requirements many European municipalities face under national accessibility and participation mandates.
Who built it
The CoSIE consortium of 25 partners across 10 countries is heavily weighted toward universities (12) and public/civic organizations (10), with only 2 industry partners and zero SMEs — giving it just an 8% industry ratio. This tells a business buyer two things: first, the research and methodology are academically robust with strong public sector validation. Second, there is a clear market gap — no commercial player has yet packaged these validated methods into a product or service offering. For a GovTech company or public sector consultancy, this represents an opportunity to be the first to commercialize proven approaches that 25 organizations spent 3.5 years developing and testing.
- TURUN AMMATTIKORKEAKOULU OYCoordinator · FI
- Stichting Hogeschool Utrechtparticipant · NL
- AZIENDA UNITA SANITARIA LOCALE DI REGGIO EMILIAparticipant · IT
- UNIWERSYTET WROCLAWSKIparticipant · PL
- DEBRECENI EGYETEMparticipant · HU
- THE MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITYparticipant · UK
- UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNEparticipant · UK
- LEPIDA SCPAparticipant · IT
- PEOPLE S VOICE MEDIA LBGparticipant · UK
- UNIVERSITY OF NORTHUMBRIA AT NEWCASTLEparticipant · UK
- ALMA MATER STUDIORUM - UNIVERSITA DI BOLOGNAparticipant · IT
- UNIVERSITAT POLITECNICA DE VALENCIAparticipant · ES
- JONKOPINGS KOMMUNparticipant · SE
- PANTEIO PANEPISTIMIO KOINONIKON KAIPOLITIKON EPISTIMONparticipant · EL
- TALLINN UNIVERSITYparticipant · EE
- KARLSTADS UNIVERSITETparticipant · SE
Turku University of Applied Sciences (TURUN AMMATTIKORKEAKOULU OY), Finland — Higher Education institution, coordinated the 25-partner consortium
Talk to the team behind this work.
Want to turn CoSIE's tested co-creation methods into a commercial service? SciTransfer can connect you with the research team and help you build a business case around these piloted models.