If you are an urban design firm competing for city greening contracts — this project developed decision support tools including an online application and a global benchmarking tool tested across 10 case studies in Europe and China. These tools let you back your proposals with cross-continental evidence on which urban forest strategies actually deliver ecosystem services, giving you an edge over competitors who rely on guesswork.
Decision Tools Helping Cities Deploy Urban Forests to Solve Environmental Challenges
Cities worldwide are realizing that planting trees isn't just about looking nice — it's a serious engineering tool for cooling streets, absorbing floods, and improving air quality. This project studied 10 cities across Europe and China to figure out what actually works when cities invest in urban forests, and what doesn't. They built online decision-support tools and benchmarking systems so city planners and businesses can compare approaches, pick the right tree-based solutions, and avoid expensive mistakes. Think of it as a "TripAdvisor for urban greening" — evidence-based ratings on what tree strategies deliver real results.
What needed solving
Cities face mounting pressure to adapt to climate change, manage flooding, reduce heat islands, and improve air quality — but they lack evidence-based tools to decide which tree-based solutions actually work and where to invest. Urban planners and developers are often guessing when it comes to green infrastructure, risking expensive projects that underdeliver on environmental and social outcomes.
What was built
The project built an online decision-support application, a global benchmarking tool for comparing urban forest strategies, screening tools for exploratory case study analysis, and guidance documents for co-designing urban tree solutions with local communities. These were validated across 10 case study cities in Europe and China, producing 22 deliverables in total.
Who needs this
Who can put this to work
If you are a property developer required to meet urban green space regulations or wanting to boost property values through nature-based solutions — this project created guidelines and evidence from 26 partner organizations across 12 countries on how tree-based ecosystems improve urban wellbeing. You can use their benchmarking data to justify green infrastructure investments to investors and municipal authorities.
If you are a consulting firm advising municipalities on climate adaptation and green infrastructure — this project produced 22 deliverables including screening tools and guidance documents for co-designing urban forest solutions with local communities. Their comparative data from 10 European and Chinese cities gives you ready-made evidence to support your advisory work on biodiversity, resilience, and ecosystem services.
Quick answers
What would it cost to access or license these decision tools?
Based on available project data, the tools — including the online application and global benchmarking tool — were developed under EU public research funding (RIA scheme). This typically means outputs are publicly accessible. However, commercial use, integration into proprietary platforms, or customized deployments may require a licensing arrangement with the European Forest Institute (coordinator).
Can these tools work at industrial scale for a large city or metro region?
The tools were tested across 10 case studies spanning European and Chinese cities, which suggests they handle diverse urban scales and governance contexts. The 26-partner consortium across 12 countries contributed multi-continental evidence, but adapting the tools to a specific mega-city would likely require local data calibration.
Who owns the intellectual property — can we build products on top of this?
As a publicly funded Research and Innovation Action, IP is typically retained by the consortium members, coordinated by the European Forest Institute in Finland. Commercial licensing or co-development partnerships would need to be negotiated directly with them.
Does this meet current EU and municipal green infrastructure regulations?
The project directly addressed governance and policy drivers for urban forest solutions, with dedicated work packages on policy analysis and Sino-European science-policy symposia targeting senior decision-makers. Their guidelines were designed to align with urban planning regulatory contexts across 12 participating countries.
How long before we could deploy these tools in a real project?
The project ran from 2019 to 2024 and is now closed, meaning the tools are finalized. The online application and benchmarking tool exist as completed outputs. Deployment timeline depends on your specific city context and data availability, but the tools themselves are ready for use.
Can these tools integrate with existing city planning software?
Based on available project data, the online application was designed as a standalone decision-support tool. Integration with GIS platforms or existing municipal planning systems is not explicitly documented in the deliverables. You would need to discuss technical compatibility with the development team.
Who built it
The 26-partner consortium spans 12 countries including both European nations (AT, BE, CH, DE, ES, FI, FR, HR, IT, PL) and China/Hong Kong, giving the results genuine cross-continental credibility. However, the business relevance is limited: only 1 industry partner and 2 SMEs (4% industry ratio), with the consortium dominated by 9 universities and 9 research organizations. This is a heavily research-driven project coordinated by the European Forest Institute in Finland — a recognized authority in forestry but not a commercial entity. For a business looking to adopt these tools, expect to work with academic partners rather than commercial vendors.
- EUROPEAN FOREST INSTITUTECoordinator · FI
- FUNDACJA SENDZIMIRAparticipant · PL
- HRVATSKI SUMARSKI INSTITUTparticipant · HR
- VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSELparticipant · BE
- GMINA MIEJSKA KRAKOW - MIASTO NA PRAWACH POWIATUparticipant · PL
- LGI SUSTAINABLE INNOVATIONparticipant · FR
- BEIJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITYparticipant · CN
- Zhejiang Universityparticipant · CN
- UICN, UNION INTERNATIONALE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE ET DE SES RESSOURCESparticipant · CH
- VLAAMS-BRABANTparticipant · BE
- LUONNONVARAKESKUSparticipant · FI
- THE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONGparticipant · HK
- CENTRO DE INVESTIGACION ECOLOGICA Y APLICACIONES FORESTALESparticipant · ES
- UNIVERSITAET FUER BODENKULTUR WIENparticipant · AT
- BRUXELLES ENVIRONNEMENT - LEEFMILIEU BRUSSELparticipant · BE
- HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITAET ZU BERLINparticipant · DE
- AREA METROPOLITANA DE BARCELONAparticipant · ES
- UNIWERSYTET LODZKIparticipant · PL
- FUJIAN AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY UNIVERSITYparticipant · CN
- UNIVERSITA DEGLI STUDI DI BARI ALDO MOROparticipant · IT
European Forest Institute (Finland) — search for CLEARING HOUSE project coordinator at EFI
Talk to the team behind this work.
Want to know if these urban forest tools fit your city project or green infrastructure bid? SciTransfer can arrange a direct introduction to the research team and help you evaluate the commercial potential.