SciTransfer
AI4Gov · Project

Trusted AI Tools for Fair and Transparent Automated Decision Making in Government

digitalTestedTRL 5

Imagine a digital judge or clerk that makes decisions but can't explain why or might be accidentally biased against certain people. This work builds a set of 'safety checks' and 'translation tools' that make these AI systems fair and easy for humans to understand. It's like adding a transparent glass wall and a guidebook to a black-box machine so everyone knows the rules are being followed.

By the numbers
3,000,000
EU Contribution in EUR
14
Total partners
7
Industry partners
The business problem

What needed solving

Government agencies using AI risk legal penalties and public backlash if their automated decisions are biased or cannot be explained. There is a critical lack of tools to detect and remove this bias while remaining compliant with new laws like the AI Act.

The solution

What was built

A Bias Detector toolkit, a Virtualized Unbiasing Framework (VUF), and a library of XAI/SAX models for explaining AI decisions. It also includes Blockchain-based governance applications and a catalogue of policy models.

Audience

Who needs this

GovTech software developersAI compliance officersPublic administration digital transformation leadsLegal tech auditing firms
Business applications

Who can put this to work

GovTech
SME
Target: Public sector software provider

If you are a software provider dealing with strict AI Act compliance for city halls — this project developed a Bias Detector and Virtualized Unbiasing Framework that ensures automated decisions are fair and non-discriminatory.

Legal Tech
mid-size
Target: Compliance auditing firm

If you are an auditing firm dealing with the need to prove AI fairness to regulators — this project developed XAI algorithms and a library for explaining AI decisions that turn complex code into human-readable justifications.

Cybersecurity
enterprise
Target: Blockchain infrastructure provider

If you are a tech firm dealing with trust issues in digital voting or governance — this project developed decentralized Blockchain-based applications that monitor and revise governance rules throughout their lifecycle.

Frequently asked

Quick answers

What is the cost or price for implementing these tools?

Based on available project data, no commercial pricing or licensing costs are mentioned; the project received a EUR 3,000,000 EU contribution for development.

Can this be deployed at an industrial scale?

The project includes 7 industry partners and developed software implementations for monitoring and visualization, suggesting a move toward scalable tools, though full industrial scale is not explicitly confirmed.

Who owns the IP and how is licensing handled?

Based on available project data, specific licensing terms are not provided, but the project delivers a catalogue of policy models and datasets for reuse in different domains.

How does this help with AI regulation?

The project specifically targets AI Regulation and the AI Act by providing technical measures to mitigate bias and ensure fairness in AI systems.

How is the software integrated into existing systems?

The project defined interfaces and interactions between toolkits, libraries, and components to ensure different software parts work together.

Consortium

Who built it

The consortium is heavily industry-weighted with 7 companies (50% of the 14 partners), including 3 SMEs. This strong commercial presence, combined with partners from 8 different countries, indicates a high focus on practical application and cross-border regulatory alignment rather than purely academic research.

How to reach the team

Contact MAGGIOLI SPA in Italy for technical inquiries regarding the Bias Detector toolkit.

Next steps

Talk to the team behind this work.

Request a technical deep-dive into the XAI library for your compliance roadmap.