SciTransfer
Organization

UNIVERSITY OF CAPE COAST

Ghanaian university bridging agroecology, water innovation, and circular farming across West and North Africa through EU-funded research.

University research groupfoodGHThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€752K
Unique partners
38
What they do

Their core work

The University of Cape Coast contributes applied agricultural research expertise focused on smallholder farming systems in West and North Africa. Their work spans agroecological practices, sustainable land and water management, and circular bio-based innovations — grounded in real field conditions across Ghana, Burkina Faso, Niger, Egypt, and Tunisia. In both H2020 projects, they serve as a regional knowledge anchor for Africa, providing local agricultural expertise, farmer engagement, and capacity-building activities that European-led consortia need to operate on the ground. They bridge between international research agendas and African farming realities, translating scientific methods into farmer-applicable practices.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Sustainable smallholder farming systemsprimary
2 projects

Both SustInAfrica and DIVAGRI involve the university in research on resilient, low-input farming systems adapted to West and North African conditions.

Agroecology and agroforestryprimary
1 project

SustInAfrica (2020–2026) focuses explicitly on agroecology, agroforestry, and organic farming as pathways to sustainable intensification.

Water management and alternative irrigationsecondary
2 projects

Water management appeared in SustInAfrica; DIVAGRI extends this to solar desalination and clay-based micro-irrigation as low-cost water access solutions.

Circular and bio-based agricultural innovationemerging
1 project

DIVAGRI (2021–2025) introduces biorefinery concepts, inter-cropping for soil health, and revenue diversification through bio-based circular models.

Capacity building and farmer cooperationsecondary
1 project

DIVAGRI keywords include capacity building, knowledge-bank, and farmer cooperation, indicating a role in translating research outputs to farming communities.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Agroecology and sustainable land use
Recent focus
Circular agriculture and low-cost irrigation technology

Their earlier H2020 engagement (SustInAfrica, 2020) concentrated on land stewardship practices — agroecology, agroforestry, organic farming, and integrated water and land management across West and North Africa. The second project (DIVAGRI, 2021) marks a visible shift toward technology-enabled solutions: solar desalination, clay-based micro-irrigation, biorefinery, and circular revenue models, alongside a stronger emphasis on biodiversity, ecosystem services, and structured farmer knowledge-sharing. The trend suggests a progression from documenting and promoting good agricultural practices toward co-developing and disseminating practical low-cost technologies that diversify income and improve resource efficiency for African smallholders.

This university is moving from broad sustainability frameworks toward specific technical innovations — water access, biorefinery, and circular farming — suggesting growing appetite for partnerships involving applied technology transfer to African agricultural contexts.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: Global19 countries collaborated

The University of Cape Coast joins consortia as a participant rather than leading them — a pattern consistent with a regional expertise partner brought in for their African field knowledge and stakeholder access. Despite only two projects, they have accumulated 38 unique consortium partners across 19 countries, indicating placement in large, multi-partner Research and Innovation Actions rather than focused bilateral collaborations. This suggests they are valued as a bridge partner — selected because they provide African ground-truth that European partners cannot replicate internally.

With 38 unique partners spanning 19 countries from only two projects, their network is disproportionately broad for their project volume, reflecting participation in large pan-African and Euro-African consortia. Their geographic footprint spans West Africa, North Africa, and European research institutions, making them a natural connector for multi-continent agricultural research initiatives.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

The University of Cape Coast offers something rare in H2020 consortia: an established Ghanaian academic institution with documented research engagement across West Africa (Ghana, Burkina Faso, Niger) and the ability to bridge to North African contexts. For European consortia targeting African food system transformation, they provide regional legitimacy, local farmer networks, and on-the-ground capacity-building reach that cannot be substituted by remote research. Their dual focus on ecological farming practices and emerging low-cost technologies positions them as a versatile regional partner for projects at the intersection of sustainability science and practical rural development.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • DIVAGRI
    The larger of the two projects by funding (EUR 385,525), it introduces an unusually wide technical scope — combining solar desalination, clay-based micro-irrigation, biorefinery, and circular economy principles — signaling the university's willingness to engage with hardware and systems innovation, not just agronomic practice.
  • SustInAfrica
    A long-duration project (2020–2026) spanning five countries across two African sub-regions, it positions the university within a major pan-African resilience research program and demonstrates their ability to contribute to multi-year, geographically complex agricultural initiatives.
Cross-sector capabilities
environmentsocietyenergy
Analysis note: Only two projects available, both starting within a single year (2020–2021), limiting the ability to observe long-term strategic evolution. The keyword-based evolution analysis reflects a shift between projects rather than a multi-year trend. Profile conclusions are directionally sound but should be revisited if additional project history or institutional profiles become available.