SciTransfer
Organization

UDRUGE CENTAR ZA MIROVNE STUDIJE

Croatian NGO with field expertise in migrant children education, social integration, and civic media across European research consortia.

NGO / AssociationsocietyHRNo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€166K
Unique partners
23
What they do

Their core work

Center for Peace Studies is a Zagreb-based Croatian civil society organization working on human rights, migration, and social integration. In EU research projects, they contribute ground-level expertise in working with migrant communities — particularly children — bringing practitioner knowledge that academic partners cannot replicate. Their work bridges policy and practice: they translate research findings into actionable approaches for schools, reception centers, and local communities dealing with migrant integration. They also have experience in media and public information projects, having participated in work related to communicating socioeconomic issues to broader audiences.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Migrant children education and integrationprimary
1 project

MiCREATE (2019–2022) focused specifically on migrant children and communities in Europe, with keywords including child-centered approach, reception communities, and inclusion.

Civil society practice in migration policyprimary
2 projects

Both projects — PIE News and MiCREATE — engaged societal dimensions of migration, poverty, and exclusion, reflecting the organization's NGO mandate and community access.

Media literacy and socioeconomic public informationsecondary
1 project

PIE News (2016–2019) addressed poverty, income, and employment news, suggesting involvement in civic media, journalism, or public communication around social issues.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Civic media and social issues
Recent focus
Migrant children integration

In their first H2020 project (2016–2019), the organization worked on PIE News — a project about communicating poverty, income, and employment issues, likely involving media, civic education, or journalism. By 2019, their focus had clearly shifted toward direct migration and integration work: MiCREATE placed them squarely in the space of migrant children, reception communities, and inclusive education. This trajectory reflects the broader European context post-2015 refugee crisis, where organizations with social integration expertise were increasingly sought for research consortia.

The organization is moving deeper into migration and social inclusion research — likely a stable direction given the ongoing policy relevance of migrant integration across Europe.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European13 countries collaborated

Center for Peace Studies has participated exclusively as a consortium partner, never as coordinator, across both H2020 projects. Despite the small number of projects, they have accumulated 23 unique partners across 13 countries — an unusually broad network for an organization of this size, suggesting they are valued contributors in large European research consortia. This pattern indicates they are brought in for their civil society expertise and community access rather than for project management capacity.

23 unique consortium partners across 13 countries from just 2 projects — indicating engagement in large, geographically diverse European research consortia. No strong geographic concentration is apparent beyond their Croatian base.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

As a Croatian NGO with direct community access to migrant and refugee populations, Center for Peace Studies offers something most academic or technical partners cannot: practitioner legitimacy and field-level insight in Central/Eastern European reception contexts. For consortium builders working on migration, integration, or social cohesion projects, they fill the civil society and end-user representation role that EU funders increasingly require. Their combination of media literacy work (PIE News) and integration practice (MiCREATE) makes them relevant to projects that cross the information–inclusion boundary.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • PIE News
    Largest budget of the two projects (EUR 122,937) and an unusual combination of socioeconomic journalism and digital media within a civil society context.
  • MiCREATE
    Most thematically representative project — migrant children and communities across transforming Europe — directly reflecting the organization's core mission and generating the richest keyword profile.
Cross-sector capabilities
digitaleducationsecurity
Analysis note: Only 2 projects with limited keyword extraction — the early project (PIE News) has no keywords in the dataset, making early-period analysis inferential from the project title alone. Profile direction is reasonably clear but depth is limited. Confidence would increase significantly with access to project description text or deliverables.