SciTransfer
Organization

UBIQUITY PRESS LIMITED

London open access publisher with EU infrastructure experience in research monograph integration and text-data-mining enablement for science.

Technology SMEdigitalUKSMENo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€317K
Unique partners
18
What they do

Their core work

Ubiquity Press is a London-based open access academic publisher that specialises in making scholarly outputs — journals, books, and research monographs — freely available and technically interoperable across research infrastructures. Their H2020 participation shows they operate at the intersection of publishing and digital research infrastructure: they help make scholarly content machine-readable, metadata-rich, and integrated into European open science systems. Rather than simply printing and distributing academic work, they build the technical and policy conditions under which research outputs become useful inputs for further discovery — including text and data mining. As an SME in this space, they occupy a practical, implementation-oriented role that larger publishers rarely fill.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Open access publishing infrastructureprimary
2 projects

Both FutureTDM and HIRMEOS involved Ubiquity Press directly in making scholarly content openly accessible and technically interoperable within European research environments.

Research monograph disseminationprimary
1 project

HIRMEOS (2017-2019) specifically addressed the integration of research monographs into European Open Science infrastructure, an area where Ubiquity Press has direct operational experience as a publisher of open access books.

Text and data mining (TDM) for researchsecondary
1 project

FutureTDM (2015-2017) focused on reducing barriers to TDM in research environments, placing Ubiquity Press in a position to contribute knowledge about how published content can be made available for computational analysis.

Open science policy and practicesecondary
2 projects

Participation in both a CSA (coordination action) and a RIA (research action) indicates involvement in both policy-level coordination and hands-on implementation work around open science norms.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
TDM barriers and open access policy
Recent focus
Open science infrastructure for monographs

Their two projects trace a clear arc: FutureTDM (2015-2017) was a coordination and support action focused on removing legal and technical barriers that prevent researchers from mining published content — a largely policy and awareness-raising effort. HIRMEOS (2017-2019) was a research action that moved into active technical infrastructure, embedding monographs into the European Open Science stack with real integration work. The shift is from enabling access in principle to building the plumbing that makes access work in practice. There is no data beyond 2019, so it is not possible to confirm whether this infrastructure-building trajectory continued.

Ubiquity Press appears to be moving from policy advocacy toward technical infrastructure roles — a direction that would make them a useful partner for EOSC-related projects or any initiative needing a publisher with hands-on open science integration experience.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European8 countries collaborated

Ubiquity Press has only ever appeared as a participant, never as coordinator, across both H2020 projects — suggesting they join consortia as a specialist contributor rather than driving them. Despite only two projects, they engaged with 18 distinct partners across 8 countries, which is a wide network for a small publisher and points to genuine integration into the European open science community. They appear to work well in cross-disciplinary, infrastructure-focused consortia where their publishing expertise is a distinct and needed component rather than the central capability.

Ubiquity Press has collaborated with 18 partners across 8 countries within just two projects, indicating strong connectivity relative to their project volume. Their network spans European research infrastructures and open science communities rather than any single national cluster.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

Ubiquity Press occupies a rare position: a small, technically capable open access publisher with direct experience in EU research infrastructure projects. Most publishers in H2020 consortia are large commercial houses; Ubiquity Press brings the same publishing domain knowledge at SME speed and flexibility. For a consortium needing a partner who understands both scholarly content production and open infrastructure requirements — metadata standards, TDM licensing, monograph discoverability — they offer a combination that is genuinely uncommon at their size.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • HIRMEOS
    The largest of their two projects by funding (EUR 230,686) and a RIA — meaning real research and development work — directly targeting the integration of scholarly monographs into the European Open Science Cloud, which is a high-priority and technically demanding infrastructure challenge.
  • FutureTDM
    Their entry point into H2020, this coordination action positioned Ubiquity Press within the EU policy conversation on text and data mining rights — an area that has since become central to the EU's data strategy and AI Act discussions.
Cross-sector capabilities
Society and research policy (scholarly communication reform, open access mandates)Legal and regulatory (TDM licensing, copyright in research environments)Health and life sciences (open access publishing infrastructure applicable to biomedical research dissemination)
Analysis note: Only 2 projects with no structured keyword or sector data in the CORDIS extract. Project title descriptions are informative enough to support a reasonable profile, and Ubiquity Press is a publicly known open access publisher whose real-world activities are consistent with the project scope — but the profile relies partly on that external knowledge rather than rich CORDIS metadata. Treat expertise claims as directionally sound but not granularly validated. No activity data beyond 2019 is available from this dataset.