SciTransfer
Organization

TECHNOLOGY CENTRE MONGSTAD

World-scale industrial CO2 capture test facility in Norway, validating CCS technologies across energy, cement, and biorefinery sectors.

Infrastructure providerenergyNO
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€2.0M
Unique partners
40
What they do

Their core work

Technology Centre Mongstad (TCM) is the world's largest facility for testing and qualifying carbon capture technologies, located at Norway's Mongstad refinery complex. They provide real industrial-scale test infrastructure where companies and research consortia can validate CO2 capture processes — from novel sorbent materials like metal-organic frameworks to enzymatic solvents and packed-bed absorbers — under actual flue gas conditions. In H2020, TCM contributed primarily as a test site and industrial validation partner: bridging laboratory-scale innovations to deployment readiness for cement, biorefinery, waste-to-energy, and power plant applications. Their core value is not research invention but real-world proof — they can confirm whether a CCS technology actually works at scale before anyone commits to full deployment.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Carbon capture technology testing and validationprimary
2 projects

Both MOF4AIR and ACCSESS rely on TCM as an industrial-scale test environment for validating novel CO2 capture approaches ranging from MOF-based adsorption to enzymatic solvents.

Metal-organic framework (MOF) adsorption processesprimary
1 project

MOF4AIR (2019–2025, EUR 1.27M) specifically tests MOF materials in VPSA and MBTSA swing adsorption configurations for power and industrial CCS applications.

CCUS for hard-to-abate industrial sectorsprimary
1 project

ACCSESS (2021–2026) covers CCUS across cement, pulp and paper, waste-to-energy, and biorefining — sectors where decarbonization is technically and economically difficult.

Novel CO2 capture solvents and absorbent systemssecondary
1 project

ACCSESS includes enzymatic solvent and rotary packed bed absorber testing, suggesting TCM's infrastructure accommodates a range of solvent-based and intensified capture systems.

CCUS chain integration and cost optimizationemerging
1 project

ACCSESS keywords include 'CCUS chain optimization' and 'sustainable cities', indicating expanding scope toward full-chain deployment economics and urban decarbonization contexts.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
MOF sorbents and swing adsorption CCS
Recent focus
Multi-sector industrial CCUS deployment

TCM's H2020 engagement began with a materials and process focus — MOF sorbents, swing adsorption cycles (VPSA, MBTSA), and proof-of-concept carbon capture configurations. Their more recent project shifted toward industrial application breadth: cement, biorefinery, waste-to-energy, and concrete recarbonation, alongside full CCUS chain optimization and sustainable city contexts. The shift signals a move from validating individual capture technologies to demonstrating CCS viability across the entire hard-to-abate industrial landscape — from material to deployment at multiple scales and sectors.

TCM is evolving from a single-technology test host into a multi-sector CCUS demonstration hub, making them an increasingly relevant partner for any consortium needing industrial-scale validation across hard-to-abate industries.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: infrastructure_providerReach: European12 countries collaborated

TCM participates exclusively as a consortium partner — never as coordinator in their H2020 portfolio — which reflects their role as a specialist infrastructure provider rather than a project driver. With 40 unique partners across 12 countries spread over just 2 projects, their consortia are large and internationally diverse, typical of flagship CCS research projects. This suggests they are sought out for their physical testing assets and are accustomed to operating within complex multi-partner structures without leading the administrative workload.

TCM has built connections with 40 unique consortium partners across 12 countries through just two projects, indicating each project brought a large, diverse international consortium. Their Norwegian base and industrial identity likely attract both Northern European energy sector partners and pan-European CCS research networks.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

Technology Centre Mongstad is one of very few facilities globally that can test post-combustion CO2 capture at true industrial scale, using real flue gases from an operating refinery — something no university lab or pilot plant can replicate. For any CCS technology developer needing TRL 6–8 validation, TCM's infrastructure is a near-irreplaceable asset, making them a high-value consortium partner with low substitutability. Their positioning at an active refinery also gives direct access to real industrial process conditions across multiple flue gas compositions.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • MOF4AIR
    The largest of TCM's two H2020 projects (EUR 1.27M), it represents a high-risk, high-reward bet on metal-organic frameworks as next-generation solid sorbents for CCS — a significant departure from conventional amine scrubbing.
  • ACCSESS
    Covers the broadest industrial scope of TCM's portfolio — cement, biorefinery, waste-to-energy, and concrete recarbonation in a single project — making it a flagship demonstration of CCUS replicability across hard-to-abate sectors.
Cross-sector capabilities
Industrial decarbonization (cement, pulp and paper, waste-to-energy)Circular economy and biorefiningUrban climate infrastructure (sustainable cities, concrete recarbonation)
Analysis note: Only 2 projects in the dataset, both as participant. The profile is analytically coherent because TCM's real-world identity (world-famous CCS test facility at Mongstad refinery) is well-established and consistent with the project keywords and roles observed. However, the small project count limits statistical confidence in network and evolution claims — the keyword shift between projects may reflect project topic differences rather than a genuine strategic pivot.