SciTransfer
Organization

STOLZENBERGER REINER ERICH

German food science specialist in plant-based ingredient extraction and underutilised crop value chain development.

Innovation consultancyfoodDEThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€290K
Unique partners
48
What they do

Their core work

STOLZENBERGER REINER ERICH is a German private-sector specialist operating at the intersection of food science and sustainable agriculture. In their first H2020 project (Prolific), they contributed to cascade processing of legumes, fungi, and coffee — specifically the extraction of proteins and bioactive molecules using enzymatic hydrolysis, working toward prototype food ingredients. In their second project (RADIANT), they shifted toward agricultural systems work: helping design dynamic value chains and decision-support tools for farmers and supply chain actors working with commercially underutilised crops. The combination of bench-level extraction expertise and market-systems experience is rare for a private entity of this scale.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Plant-based protein and bioactive compound extractionprimary
1 project

In Prolific (2018–2022), they worked on enzymatic hydrolysis and cascade extraction of proteins and bioactive molecules from legumes, fungi, and coffee for food ingredient applications.

Enzymatic hydrolysis and food ingredient prototypingprimary
1 project

Prolific explicitly involved prototype development alongside enzymatic processing — indicating hands-on ingredient development capability beyond pure research.

Value chain development for underutilised cropssecondary
1 project

RADIANT (2021–2025) focused on building dynamic value chains connecting farmers, consumers, and supply chain actors around crops with limited current commercial penetration.

Decision support systems for agri-food actorsemerging
1 project

RADIANT lists decision support systems as a core keyword, pointing to tool development or methodological contribution for value chain participants.

Co-creation methodology with farmers and consumersemerging
1 project

RADIANT's keyword set includes co-creation alongside farmers and consumers, suggesting participatory design experience in food system projects.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Plant extraction and ingredient prototyping
Recent focus
Underutilised crop value chains

In their earlier H2020 work (Prolific, 2018–2022), the focus was firmly on technical processing: extraction chemistry, enzymatic hydrolysis, and prototype ingredient development from legumes, fungi, and coffee — lab-proximal work with clear food manufacturing application. By 2021 (RADIANT), the emphasis moved decisively toward the systemic and market side: value chains, decision support, co-creation, resilience, and sustainability — concepts that belong to policy, supply chain design, and stakeholder engagement rather than the laboratory. This trajectory suggests an intentional broadening from technical food science toward applied agricultural systems and market development.

They are moving from technical food processing toward agricultural systems design — future collaborations bridging food technology with sustainability, farmer engagement, or market development would fit their evolving profile well.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European15 countries collaborated

STOLZENBERGER REINER ERICH has participated exclusively as a consortium partner across both projects — never as coordinator — indicating a preference for specialist contribution over project leadership. Despite only two projects, they have engaged with 48 unique partners across 15 countries, reflecting participation in large, multidisciplinary RIA consortia typical of Horizon 2020 food and bioeconomy calls. This pattern suggests they bring focused, defined expertise into well-structured frameworks rather than driving project management or administration.

Their network of 48 unique partners across 15 countries — drawn from just two projects — reflects involvement in sizeable European consortia rather than narrow bilateral collaboration. No single geographic cluster is identifiable from the available data.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

Very few private entities combine credible experience in both extraction chemistry (enzymatic hydrolysis, bioactive molecules) and supply chain co-design (value chains, decision support, farmer engagement) — STOLZENBERGER REINER ERICH sits at that crossover. For consortia building projects that need to connect laboratory-level food innovation with real agricultural market adoption, this dual profile is genuinely useful. Their German private-company standing and modest EU footprint also suggest they bring lean, focused input without the overhead of large institutional partners.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • Prolific
    Largest budget in their portfolio (EUR 210,144) and technically specific — cascade extraction of proteins and bioactives from three distinct plant sources (legumes, fungi, coffee) using enzymatic hydrolysis, up to prototype stage.
  • RADIANT
    Marks a clear strategic shift toward agricultural systems thinking, addressing underutilised crops through dynamic value chains, decision-support tools, and co-creation with farmers and consumers — a different competence domain from Prolific.
Cross-sector capabilities
Bioeconomy and bio-based ingredient supply chainsSustainable agriculture and rural developmentDecision support systems for complex supply chainsCircular economy applied to food and crop residues
Analysis note: The organisation name follows a personal-name pattern (surname + two given names), suggesting this may be a sole proprietor or single-person private entity rather than a conventional company — which would also explain the small funding amounts. The SME:False classification appears inconsistent with the funding scale and is likely a data quality issue. With only 2 projects, no website, and no city data, all expertise characterisations should be treated as directional indicators rather than verified capabilities.