SciTransfer
Organization

STATENS GEOTEKNISKA INSTITUT

Sweden's national geotechnical institute specialising in soil-sediment systems, land use policy, and science-to-planning knowledge transfer.

Research instituteenvironmentSENo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€93K
Unique partners
54
What they do

Their core work

Statens Geotekniska Institut (SGI) is Sweden's national geotechnical institute, responsible for research, expert advice, and public authority work on soil mechanics, geoenvironmental issues, and land stability. In EU research contexts, SGI contributes domain expertise on soil-sediment systems, land use impacts, and the interface between geotechnical science and spatial planning policy. Their H2020 participation focused on building pan-European strategic research agendas for soil and land management — a role that suits an organisation with both scientific depth and established links to national planning authorities. They operate at the boundary between applied geotechnical research and policy, translating technical soil science into regulatory and planning guidance.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Soil and sediment systems researchprimary
1 project

INSPIRATION (2015–2018) explicitly targeted soil-sediment systems as a core thematic focus within its integrated spatial planning and land management research agenda.

Land use and spatial planning policyprimary
1 project

INSPIRATION addressed land take and integrated spatial planning, areas where SGI's geotechnical expertise directly informs national and EU-level land use decisions.

Science-policy interfacesecondary
2 projects

Both INSPIRATION (strategic research agenda development) and CIMULACT (citizen and multi-actor consultation on H2020) required translating scientific knowledge into policy-relevant outputs.

Strategic research agenda developmentsecondary
1 project

INSPIRATION's primary output was a pan-European strategic research agenda for soil, land, and sediment management — a coordination task requiring synthesis across national research communities.

Citizen and stakeholder engagement in research designemerging
1 project

CIMULACT involved multi-actor consultation processes to shape H2020 research priorities, indicating SGI's participation in participatory research design beyond pure technical work.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Soil and land policy agenda
Recent focus
No recent H2020 activity

SGI's H2020 participation is entirely concentrated in 2015–2018, and both projects are Coordination and Support Actions rather than research grants — meaning their EU role was coordination, agenda-setting, and policy consultation rather than experimental research. The early-period keywords (strategic research agenda, soil-sediment system, land take, science-policy-interface) paint a clear picture: SGI engaged in EU-level efforts to define what soil and land research should look like in the coming decade. There are no recent-period keywords because no second-phase projects are present, making it impossible to observe any evolution — their H2020 engagement appears to have been a focused early intervention rather than a sustained programme.

SGI's H2020 footprint was narrow and limited to 2015–2018 coordination actions; whether they have continued EU engagement outside H2020 or shifted toward national programmes cannot be determined from this data alone.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European28 countries collaborated

SGI participated exclusively as a consortium partner — never as coordinator — across both projects, suggesting they join larger initiatives to contribute specific geotechnical expertise rather than driving project leadership. Both projects were large-consortium CSA actions, which explains the disproportionately high partner count (54 organisations, 28 countries) relative to their modest EC funding. This pattern indicates SGI is a specialist contributor that brings national authority credibility and soil science depth to multi-actor policy research networks, rather than a project management hub.

SGI has formal H2020 connections with 54 organisations across 28 countries, an unusually wide network for just two projects — a direct result of participating in large CSA consortia designed for pan-European coverage. Their reach is broadly European, spanning research institutes, planning authorities, and public bodies across the continent.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

SGI holds a distinct position as Sweden's national geotechnical authority — they are not a university group pursuing funding, but a public research institute whose scientific outputs carry regulatory weight in Swedish and Nordic planning systems. For consortia addressing soil contamination, ground stability, land take, or sustainable land use in northern Europe, SGI brings both technical credibility and direct access to national policy and standards bodies. Their combination of applied geotechnical expertise and demonstrated willingness to engage in science-policy translation is relatively rare among research partners of this type.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • INSPIRATION
    The most substantively relevant project for SGI's core expertise — a pan-European effort to define the strategic research agenda for soil, sediment, and land management, directly aligned with SGI's national mission and geotechnical domain.
  • CIMULACT
    Demonstrates SGI's engagement beyond pure geotechnics into participatory research design, as this EU-wide citizen and multi-actor consultation shaped the broader H2020 research agenda across all sectors.
Cross-sector capabilities
Urban planning and infrastructure resilienceClimate adaptation and ground stabilityWater and groundwater managementConstruction and civil engineering standards
Analysis note: Only 2 projects, both from the same 2015–2018 window, both CSA (coordination and support actions, not research grants). No second-phase H2020 activity is present, so no keyword evolution can be observed. The large partner network (54 orgs, 28 countries) reflects the structural breadth of CSA consortia and should not be interpreted as SGI's personal collaboration depth. EC funding of EUR 92,634 across two projects indicates minimal financial scale. Profile relies partly on SGI's known public identity as Sweden's national geotechnical institute to fill gaps not covered by the project data.