SciTransfer
Organization

SCHOOL OF ORIENTAL AND AFRICAN STUDIES ROYAL CHARTER

London-based specialist university in Asian, African, and Middle Eastern studies — from ancient manuscripts to contemporary migration and governance research.

University research groupsocietyUK
H2020 projects
19
As coordinator
14
Total EC funding
€16.8M
Unique partners
45
What they do

Their core work

SOAS University of London is a world-leading specialist institution for the study of Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Their research spans humanities and social sciences — from ancient manuscript traditions and literary theory to contemporary migration, governance, and political anthropology across these regions. They bring deep area-studies expertise in languages, cultures, and political systems that most European universities cannot match, making them an essential partner for any research requiring non-Western regional knowledge. Their work combines philological and textual scholarship with ethnographic fieldwork and policy-relevant social science.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Middle Eastern and Asian textual heritage and digital humanitiesprimary
4 projects

MUYA and MUYA-IIIF digitized Zoroastrian Avestan manuscripts using IIIF frameworks; GlobalLIT explored literary theory across Caucasus, Islam, and Middle East; TAXT studied Sasanian sealing practices.

Migration, governance, and refugee studiesprimary
3 projects

MAGYC addressed migration governance and asylum crises; AGRUMIG studied labour migration impacts on rural sending communities; NEWAVE examined water governance and policy change.

African and Asian film and screen studiessecondary
1 project

AFRISCREENWORLDS is a major ERC project (EUR 1.8M) focused on decolonising film and screen studies with emphasis on African and Black cinema.

Political anthropology and ethnography of institutionssecondary
2 projects

EoPPP conducted global comparative ethnography of parliaments and politicians; ASA studied African statehood through architecture — both large-scale ERC grants.

South and East Asian family and societysecondary
2 projects

Intimacy examined modern Chinese family life through multi-sited ethnography; HYP mapped Indian and transnational traditions of physical yoga through philology.

Criminal justice, gender, and authoritarianismemerging
1 project

RRSPCGBP (2021) investigates sentencing and punishment in China through a gender-based perspective, signaling new interest in comparative criminal justice.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Textual heritage and literary scholarship
Recent focus
Migration, governance, and decolonisation

SOAS's early H2020 work (2015–2018) concentrated on philological and textual scholarship — ancient languages, manuscript digitization, literary theory, and religious traditions like Zoroastrianism and Islam across the Middle East and Caucasus. From 2019 onward, the focus shifted markedly toward contemporary political and social questions: migration governance, refugee policy, parliamentary ethnography, African statehood, decolonisation of screen studies, and criminal justice in authoritarian contexts. This evolution reflects a broader institutional move from historical-textual expertise toward engaged, policy-relevant social science addressing governance, inequality, and post-colonial structures.

SOAS is moving toward politically engaged, policy-relevant research on governance, migration, and decolonial perspectives — expect future projects at the intersection of area studies and contemporary social challenges.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: consortium_leaderReach: Global25 countries collaborated

SOAS overwhelmingly leads its own research: 14 of 19 projects are coordinator-led, mostly individual ERC grants and Marie Curie fellowships reflecting principal-investigator-driven scholarship. When they do join consortia as participants (5 projects), these tend to be larger multi-partner research initiatives like MAGYC and NEWAVE. With 45 unique partners across 25 countries, they maintain a wide but loosely connected network typical of a humanities institution where each PI brings their own regional collaborators rather than returning to the same institutional partners.

SOAS has collaborated with 45 unique partners across 25 countries, reflecting genuinely global reach that extends well beyond Europe into Asia, Africa, and the Middle East — mirroring their area-studies mandate.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

SOAS is one of the very few European institutions with deep, research-active expertise across Asia, Africa, and the Middle East simultaneously — covering languages, political systems, cultural heritage, and contemporary social issues. For any EU consortium needing genuine regional expertise on non-Western societies (not surface-level "international perspectives"), SOAS brings unmatched depth. Their combination of classical philological skills with modern ethnographic and policy research means they can contribute to projects spanning from digital cultural heritage to contemporary migration governance.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • Mulosige
    Largest single grant (EUR 2.48M ERC Advanced), pioneering a new approach to world literature through multilingual and geographic analysis.
  • MUYA
    EUR 2.24M ERC project digitizing ancient Zoroastrian Avestan manuscripts, later extended with MUYA-IIIF for interoperability — rare combination of philology and digital humanities.
  • EoPPP
    EUR 2.4M ERC grant conducting global comparative ethnography of parliaments and politicians — ambitious scope bridging anthropology and political science across multiple countries.
Cross-sector capabilities
Digital humanities and cultural heritage digitization (IIIF, manuscript annotation)Migration and refugee policy analysisGovernance and institutional ethnographyFood and agriculture in developing regions (rural change, sending communities)
Analysis note: Strong profile with 19 projects and rich keyword data. Most projects are individual ERC/MSCA grants reflecting PI-driven research rather than applied technology development — relevant for academic collaboration and policy research rather than commercial technology transfer. Some early projects lack keyword data, but the overall trajectory is clear from titles and available metadata.