SciTransfer
Organization

RESEAU SEMENCES PAYSANNES - ASSOCIATION POUR LA BIODIVERSITE DES SEMENCES ET PLANTS DANS LES FERMES

French NGO preserving peasant seed diversity through farmer networks, participatory breeding, and advocacy for seed sovereignty across Europe.

NGO / AssociationfoodFRNo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€440K
Unique partners
31
What they do

Their core work

Réseau Semences Paysannes (RSP) is a French NGO that maintains and advocates for the use of traditional, farmer-saved seed varieties — what the movement calls "peasant seeds." Their core work is building and sustaining grassroots networks of farmers who grow, select, and exchange locally adapted, heritage crop varieties outside the commercial seed industry. In H2020 projects, they functioned as a practitioner-network partner, connecting academic researchers with active farming communities that maintain living seed diversity. They bring irreplaceable on-the-ground access to farmers, seed libraries, and crop populations that cannot be found in genebanks or commercial catalogues.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Farmer-managed seed diversity and on-farm conservationprimary
2 projects

Both DIVERSIFOOD and CERERE are explicitly about embedding crop diversity in farming systems, the exact domain RSP has built its identity around.

Participatory plant breeding and variety selectionprimary
2 projects

DIVERSIFOOD and CERERE both involve farmer-researcher collaboration on developing locally adapted varieties — a methodology RSP actively practices and promotes.

1 project

CERERE specifically targets diversity in organic and low-input food systems, aligning with RSP's advocacy for seed-sovereign, agrochemical-free farming.

Local and regional food system developmentsecondary
1 project

DIVERSIFOOD frames crop diversity within the context of local, high-quality food systems — a policy and supply-chain angle RSP contributes to from the seed-supply side.

Civil society networking and farmer advocacyprimary
2 projects

As an NGO coordinating a national network of peasant seed keepers, RSP's core competence in both projects was mobilizing and representing farming communities within European research consortia.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Crop diversity, local food systems
Recent focus
Cereal diversity, organic farming

Both of RSP's H2020 projects started within one year of each other (2015–2016) and ran through 2019, meaning there is effectively no temporal split to analyse — this was a single concentrated period of EU-funded engagement, not an evolution across phases. No project keywords were available in the data to trace thematic shifts. What can be said is that their two projects show a consistent focus: DIVERSIFOOD addressed crop diversity broadly for quality local food systems, while CERERE narrowed to cereals and organic/low-input contexts specifically — suggesting a deepening rather than a broadening of focus within their core seed diversity domain.

RSP appears to be deepening its specialisation in diversity-driven, low-input cereal systems rather than broadening into new sectors — making them a reliable but narrowly focused partner for agroecology and seed sovereignty research.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European15 countries collaborated

RSP has never led an H2020 project — both participations were as a consortium partner, which is typical for advocacy NGOs that contribute networks and communities of practice rather than research infrastructure. Despite their small size, they engaged in substantial consortia (31 unique partners across 15 countries), indicating they are valued as a bridge between researcher-led projects and practicing farming communities. Working with them means gaining access to their farmer network, but project coordination and technical delivery will need to come from other consortium members.

RSP collaborated with 31 unique partners across 15 countries through just two projects, reflecting the large, multi-country consortium structures typical of RIA and CSA projects on crop diversity. Their network is pan-European in reach but anchored in agricultural civil society and farmer organisations rather than universities or research institutes.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

RSP is not a research organisation — they are one of Europe's most active civil society bodies specifically dedicated to keeping traditional seed varieties alive in farmers' hands. That makes them almost impossible to replace in consortia that need credible access to farming communities maintaining rare or heritage crop populations. For any project touching seed sovereignty, participatory breeding, or the policy landscape around EU seed legislation, RSP brings political legitimacy and practitioner trust that academic partners cannot replicate.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • DIVERSIFOOD
    Their largest project by funding (€250,000) and the broadest in scope — embedding crop diversity across local food networks, positioning RSP as a key civil society node in a pan-European research effort.
  • CERERE
    Focused specifically on cereal diversity revival in organic and low-input systems, demonstrating RSP's ability to contribute to applied agronomic research — not just advocacy — within specialist crop contexts.
Cross-sector capabilities
Biodiversity and ecosystem services (on-farm genetic diversity as a conservation strategy)Rural development and agricultural policy (seed legislation, farmers' rights advocacy)Agroecology and sustainability transitions (low-input, chemical-free production systems)
Analysis note: Only 2 projects, both starting within one year of each other and all ending by 2019 — no temporal evolution is detectable. No project keywords were available, so thematic analysis relies on project titles and descriptions alone. RSP's real-world identity (peasant seed network) is well-documented externally, and that context informed this profile, but the H2020 data alone is thin. Profile should be treated as indicative, not authoritative.