SciTransfer
Organization

PHOSPRINT IDIOTIKI KEFALAIOUXIKIETAIREIA

Greek bioprinting SME using laser-induced cell transfer to build tumor-on-chip cancer models and autologous transplantable tissue constructs.

Technology SMEhealthELSME
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€285K
Unique partners
15
What they do

Their core work

PhosPrint is a Greek bioprinting technology company whose core capability is laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) — a technique that uses laser pulses to deposit living cells and biological materials with high spatial precision. They apply this technology along two tracks: building organ-on-chip platforms that recreate tumor microenvironments for cancer research, and printing functional tissue constructs (such as a fully autologous urinary bladder) intended for transplantation. The company name itself reflects this identity — "Phos" (Greek for light) combined with "Print" signals laser-driven biofabrication. In consortia they act as the specialist technology provider, contributing proprietary printing capabilities that other academic and clinical partners cannot replicate in-house.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Laser-induced forward transfer (LIFT) bioprintingprimary
2 projects

Both UroPrint and Tumor-LN-oC rely on laser bioprinting and in vivo laser bioprinting as core methodological keywords, pointing to LIFT as PhosPrint's defining technology.

Organ-on-chip and tumor microenvironment modelingprimary
1 project

Tumor-LN-oC (EUR 284,856 as participant) focuses specifically on recreating tumor and lymph node tissue on a microfluidic chip to study cancer cell migration.

Tissue engineering for transplantationsecondary
1 project

UroPrint targets fully autologous urinary bladder reconstruction using bioprinted autologous biomaterials, indicating capability in clinically oriented tissue fabrication.

Microfluidics integrationsecondary
1 project

Microfluidics appears as a keyword in Tumor-LN-oC, suggesting PhosPrint works at the intersection of printed biological constructs and fluid-handling chip architectures.

Cancer biology and preclinical model developmentemerging
1 project

Tumor-LN-oC captures tumor migration behavior within a biofabricated lymph node model, placing PhosPrint in the cancer research tooling space beyond pure materials work.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Tumor microenvironment chip modeling
Recent focus
Laser bioprinting for organ transplantation

Both H2020 projects began in 2021, so PhosPrint has no true long-term funding history to trace — the "early vs recent" keyword split reflects two parallel application tracks rather than genuine temporal change. The first track (organ-on-chip, tumor migration, microfluidics) targets research instrumentation for oncology, while the second (laser bioprinting, autologous biomaterials, in vivo printing) targets regenerative medicine and clinical transplantation. What this reveals is a deliberate two-pronged strategy: selling research tools to labs on one side and pursuing clinical tissue manufacturing on the other. If this pattern holds, the likely trajectory is deeper investment in in vivo bioprinting as that field matures toward clinical trials.

PhosPrint appears to be moving from providing research models toward clinically applicable bioprinted tissue constructs, with in vivo laser bioprinting as the technology differentiator that could position them in the regenerative medicine supply chain.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European10 countries collaborated

PhosPrint has never held a coordinator role — in both projects they join as a specialist contributor (participant or third party), which is typical for a small company whose value lies in a specific proprietary technology rather than project management. Despite their size, they operate in relatively broad consortia: 15 unique partners across 10 countries suggests they are sought out repeatedly as a technology node rather than a general research partner. This pattern indicates that working with PhosPrint means buying access to their laser bioprinting capability, not co-directing a project.

PhosPrint has built connections with 15 consortium partners across 10 countries through just two projects, suggesting efficient network building within the biomedical and nanotechnology communities. Their FET and NANO pillar affiliations point toward partnerships with frontier research groups rather than industrial manufacturers.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

PhosPrint occupies an unusual niche for a Greek SME: laser-based bioprinting is a capital- and expertise-intensive field dominated by larger Northern European and North American players, making a Greek specialist company in this space genuinely rare. Their dual coverage of cancer research models and transplantable organ constructs means they can serve both the life-science tools market and the regenerative medicine pipeline — a combination that broadens their relevance to consortium builders. For a partner seeking hands-on LIFT bioprinting execution capacity rather than theoretical expertise, PhosPrint is one of very few SMEs in Southern Europe that can actually deliver printed biological constructs.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • Tumor-LN-oC
    PhosPrint's only directly funded H2020 project (EUR 284,856), combining bioprinting with microfluidics to recreate the tumor-lymph node interface — a technically demanding cancer research platform with clear commercial potential in drug testing.
  • UroPrint
    Positions PhosPrint in the highly ambitious space of printing transplantable organs from a patient's own cells, using in vivo laser bioprinting techniques that remain at the frontier of regenerative medicine.
Cross-sector capabilities
Manufacturing — precision biofabrication and additive manufacturing of biological materialsDigital — organ-on-chip platforms with microfluidic sensor integration for diagnosticsResearch Excellence — FET-tier frontier technology applicable to materials science and nanoscale fabrication
Analysis note: Only 2 projects, both starting in the same year (2021), with one carrying no EC funding record. The keyword set is specific enough to paint a clear technical picture, but there is no multi-year funding history to validate the expertise evolution claim — the early/recent keyword split reflects two parallel project tracks, not genuine temporal change. Confidence would rise to 4-5 with evidence of patent filings, product commercialization, or additional project cycles.