SciTransfer
Organization

PER SHERBIMIN GJEOLOGJIK SHQIPTAR

Albania's national geological survey: the authoritative source for Albanian subsurface data, raw materials, groundwater, and geo-energy resources.

Public authorityenvironmentALNo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€38K
Unique partners
65
What they do

Their core work

PER SHERBIMIN GJEOLOGJIK SHQIPTAR is Albania's national geological survey — the government authority responsible for mapping, characterizing, and documenting the country's subsurface resources. Their work covers geological mapping, raw materials assessment, groundwater monitoring, and geo-energy resource characterization across Albanian territory. As the official national geological service, they are the primary custodian of Albania's subsurface data and the institutional interface for any European research or commercial initiative requiring geological information on the Western Balkans. In EU projects, they contribute national data, ground-truth regional geological models, and extend pan-European geological information platforms to cover Albanian territory.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Geological mapping and subsurface characterizationprimary
2 projects

Both MICA and GeoERA relied on national geological survey organisations as core data contributors, with GSA providing Albanian subsurface coverage.

Raw materials and mineral resources assessmentprimary
2 projects

MICA (Mineral Intelligence Capacity Analysis) directly addressed mineral intelligence, and GeoERA listed raw materials as a keyword area.

Groundwater monitoring and hydrogeologysecondary
1 project

GeoERA explicitly included groundwater as a thematic focus area within the pan-European geological service framework.

Geo-energy resourcesemerging
1 project

GeoERA listed geo-energy as a keyword, reflecting the geological survey community's expanding mandate toward geothermal and underground energy storage topics.

Geological information platforms and data infrastructuresecondary
1 project

GeoERA's objective was to establish a shared European geological information platform, requiring national surveys like GSA to contribute and integrate national datasets.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Mineral intelligence capacity
Recent focus
European geological service network

In the early period (MICA, 2015–2018), GSA's EU engagement was limited to third-party status in a mineral intelligence project, with no keywords recorded — suggesting a peripheral, data-contribution role focused narrowly on mineral resources capacity. By 2017–2022 (GeoERA), their involvement broadened considerably: they became a named participant in a large ERA-NET Cofund initiative that spanned geo-energy, groundwater, raw materials, and geological information infrastructure simultaneously. The shift suggests the organisation moved from single-topic mineral assessments toward a broader geological service mandate that mirrors international trends in national surveys integrating environmental, energy, and digital data responsibilities.

GSA is aligning with the pan-European geological surveys movement, suggesting future involvement in EU projects that need Western Balkan geological data coverage, critical raw materials mapping, or cross-border hydrogeological assessments.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European33 countries collaborated

GSA does not lead EU projects — in both H2020 participations they entered as a supporting actor, once as a third party and once as a participant in a very large consortium. Their role is characteristic of national geological surveys in accession-country or associate contexts: they provide national data layers and institutional credibility rather than driving research agendas. Working with GSA means accessing Albanian national geological datasets and a government-level partner, not a research powerhouse that will manage workpackages or write deliverables independently.

GSA's headline figures — 65 partners across 33 countries — reflect their membership in GeoERA, which was one of the largest geological survey consortia in Europe and not a network GSA built independently. Their genuine bilateral relationships are likely far narrower and concentrated among other national geological surveys in the European Geological Surveys network (EuroGeoSurveys).

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

GSA is the only institution in Albania that holds authoritative national-level geological data — no university or private firm can substitute for them when a project needs official Albanian subsurface coverage. For any EU consortium working on critical raw materials, groundwater, geothermal energy, or geological hazard assessment in the Western Balkans, GSA is the mandatory national counterpart on the Albanian side. Their value is access and legitimacy, not research output volume.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • GeoERA
    GSA's most substantial EU engagement — a 2017–2022 ERA-NET Cofund project linking all major European geological surveys into a shared research area and information platform, where GSA contributed Albanian national geological data.
  • MICA
    An early entry into EU research networks focused on mineral intelligence capacity, where GSA served as a third-party contributor — relevant given Albania's significant mineral resources including chromite and copper deposits.
Cross-sector capabilities
Energy — geothermal and underground geo-energy resource assessmentRaw materials and mining — national mineral resource inventories for the Western BalkansWater management — hydrogeological data for transboundary groundwater monitoring
Analysis note: Only 2 projects with one yielding no recorded keywords and the other providing all keyword evidence. Total EC funding is EUR 38,053 — very modest. The large partner and country counts are an artefact of GeoERA's consortium size, not GSA's own network-building activity. The profile reflects what can be reasonably inferred about a national geological survey from institutional context plus the project data; deeper expertise claims would require reviewing GSA's national publications or technical reports directly.