SciTransfer
Organization

OSBORNE CLARKE ANWALTSSOZIETAT

International law firm specialising in EU regulatory frameworks for renewable energy finance, crowdfunding, and open science policy.

Law firm / Legal advisoryenergyDENo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€323K
Unique partners
39
What they do

Their core work

Osborne Clarke is an international commercial law firm operating in Cologne, Germany, that brings legal and regulatory expertise into EU research consortia — a role most research-only organisations cannot fill. Their H2020 participation centres on the legal conditions for innovative financing instruments, specifically the regulatory environment for crowdfunding applied to renewable energy projects, and more broadly on the policy and legal dimensions of open science. In practice, they advise consortia on how proposed mechanisms fit within EU financial regulation, national legal frameworks, and public policy, translating research outcomes into actionable regulatory guidance. Both of their EU projects are Coordination and Support Actions (CSA), the funding type specifically designed for policy, standardisation, and dissemination work rather than experimental research — which is precisely the space where a law firm adds value.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Regulatory frameworks for crowdfunding and alternative financeprimary
1 project

CrowdFundRES (2015–2018) focused specifically on the legal and regulatory conditions for using crowdfunding to finance renewable energy projects across Europe.

Renewable energy project finance and public acceptanceprimary
1 project

CrowdFundRES keywords include 'innovative financing', 'fund raising', 'project development', 'citizens', 'communities', and 'public acceptance', indicating advisory work spanning finance law and community engagement dimensions.

Open science policy and legal aspects in transportsecondary
1 project

BE OPEN (2019–2021) was a European forum and observatory for open science in transport, where Osborne Clarke likely contributed expertise on intellectual property, data sharing, and open access regulatory issues.

EU policy coordination and disseminationsecondary
2 projects

Both projects used the CSA funding scheme, meaning all H2020 work has been in policy coordination and knowledge dissemination rather than technical research — consistent with a legal advisory profile.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Renewable energy crowdfunding regulation
Recent focus
Open science in transport

In their first H2020 project (2015–2018), Osborne Clarke was squarely focused on the intersection of renewable energy and innovative financing — specifically the regulatory conditions for crowdfunding as a mechanism for funding clean energy. The keyword set from this period is rich and specific: crowdfunding, fund raising, public acceptance, communities, platform. Their second project (2019–2021) shifted to a different domain entirely — open science policy in transport — with no available keywords, suggesting a broader and potentially more peripheral contribution there. The pattern suggests they followed market and policy opportunities rather than deepening a single technical niche: energy finance law first, then transport open science policy.

Their trajectory shows a move from a specific energy finance niche toward broader open science and transport policy, which may indicate they are positioning as a generalist legal voice in EU research policy rather than a specialist in any single domain.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European19 countries collaborated

Osborne Clarke has never led an H2020 project — they join as a specialist participant, contributing legal and regulatory expertise that complements the technical partners. With 39 unique consortium partners across just 2 projects, they have worked in moderately large consortia (roughly 20 partners per project on average), which is typical for CSA actions that require broad stakeholder representation. This pattern suggests they are recruited as a named legal expert to give consortia credibility with regulatory bodies, not as an operational manager.

Across 2 projects, Osborne Clarke has built connections with 39 distinct partners spanning 19 countries — a notably broad European footprint for such a small H2020 portfolio. Their reach across nearly a fifth of EU member and associated states reflects the pan-European nature of CSA consortia, which typically require geographic diversity to produce policy recommendations applicable across member states.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

Osborne Clarke is one of very few commercial law firms appearing in the H2020 participant database, which immediately distinguishes them from universities, research institutes, and consultancies. They bring something genuinely rare to a consortium: the ability to assess whether a proposed financing instrument or open-data mechanism is legally viable across multiple EU jurisdictions. For any project where regulatory feasibility, financial law compliance, or intellectual property governance is a concern, a law firm partner of this calibre provides credibility with policymakers and funders that no research organisation can replicate.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • CrowdFundRES
    The larger of the two projects (EUR 214,644), it addressed a genuinely underexplored regulatory gap — how EU crowdfunding rules could be adapted to enable citizen investment in renewable energy — making it directly relevant to the EU's current retail investment and energy community legislation.
  • BE OPEN
    Participation in a European observatory for open science in transport signals Osborne Clarke's ability to contribute to policy-formation projects at the intersection of data governance, IP law, and transport research infrastructure.
Cross-sector capabilities
transport policy and open science regulationfinancial services and fintech regulationenvironment and climate finance lawdigital and data governance
Analysis note: Only 2 projects available, both CSA type, with no coordinator experience and no keywords recorded for the second project. The profile is coherent — a law firm in CSA actions is a recognisable pattern — but the depth of their actual legal contributions to each consortium cannot be verified from title and keyword data alone. Confidence is low due to thin evidence base, not due to any inconsistency in the data.