SciTransfer
Organization

ONTARIO COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN UNIVERSITY

Canadian art and design university offering design thinking and co-creation facilitation for EU–North America research and innovation policy dialogues.

University research groupsocietyCANo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€31K
Unique partners
22
What they do

Their core work

OCAD University is Canada's largest art and design university, bringing design thinking, participatory facilitation, and co-creation methodologies into research and innovation policy contexts. In H2020 projects, they contributed as a North American bridge institution — connecting European research networks with Canadian and US communities through structured ICT cooperation dialogues and capacity-building workshops. Their distinctive value is applying creative, people-centered design methods to complex challenges like international R&I policy alignment and gender equity in science systems. They are not a laboratory or engineering partner; they are a process and facilitation specialist with a transatlantic reach.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Design thinking and co-creation facilitationprimary
2 projects

Both DISCOVERY and GENDER STI cite design thinking and co-creative facilitation as OCAD's explicit methodological contribution to multi-stakeholder international dialogues.

EU–North America ICT cooperation dialoguessecondary
1 project

DISCOVERY (2016–2017) positioned OCAD as a key non-EU node for building action-oriented ICT R&I cooperation dialogues between Europe, Canada, and the USA.

Gender equality in science, technology and innovationemerging
1 project

GENDER STI (2020–2023) engaged OCAD in bilateral and multilateral policy dialogues on gender equity in R&I, applying benchmarking and community-of-practice tools.

Participatory methods for international policy dialoguesprimary
2 projects

Across both projects, OCAD's role centers on people-centric facilitation, structured interaction design, and capacity-building workshops for diverse international participant groups.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
EU–North America ICT dialogues
Recent focus
Gender equity in R&I policy

In their first H2020 project (DISCOVERY, 2016–2017), OCAD's contribution was squarely in ICT cooperation infrastructure — running discovery labs, facilitating transatlantic networking events, and connecting political, industry, and economic thought-leaders across the EU, US, and Canada. By 2020–2023 (GENDER STI), the subject matter shifted entirely to gender equality and social equity in R&I systems, though the same participatory toolkit — design thinking, co-creation, benchmarking, communities of practice — remained central. This suggests OCAD's core offer is methodological (facilitation and design process) rather than domain-specific, making them adaptable to whatever policy dialogue topic a consortium requires.

OCAD is moving from technology cooperation facilitation toward social equity and inclusion themes in science policy, which aligns with growing EU and Canadian priority areas — making them a plausible partner for future Horizon Europe projects in responsible research and innovation or ERA-related gender mainstreaming initiatives.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: Global18 countries collaborated

OCAD has never coordinated an H2020 project, always joining as a participant within large international consortia. With 22 unique partners across 18 countries from just two projects, they are embedded in wide, diverse networks rather than tight repeated-partner clusters. Their role is consistently that of a specialist contributor — brought in for their facilitation methodology and their non-EU geographic position — rather than a technical work-package leader or project manager.

Despite only two H2020 projects, OCAD has accumulated 22 distinct consortium partners across 18 countries, a sign of participation in broad, politically diverse international consortia. Their Canadian base gives European consortia a credible third-country anchor, particularly for projects requiring transatlantic reach under EU international cooperation mandates.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

OCAD is unusual among H2020 participants because it is a dedicated art and design institution, not a science or engineering university — meaning it brings creative process design and human-centered facilitation as its core research competency, not laboratory output. As a Canadian institution, it fulfills a structural need in EU consortia targeting North American cooperation, offering authentic connections to US and Canadian research, policy, and industry networks that European partners typically cannot provide. For consortia working on dialogue-heavy, multi-stakeholder international programs, OCAD offers a rare combination of methodological creativity and transatlantic institutional legitimacy.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • DISCOVERY
    OCAD's only funded H2020 project and their entry into EU cooperation, where they served as a North American anchor institution facilitating structured ICT R&I dialogues between Europe, Canada, and the USA using discovery lab formats.
  • GENDER STI
    Demonstrates OCAD's ability to reapply its design-thinking and co-creation toolkit to social policy domains, contributing to a multi-year multilateral dialogue on gender equality in science and technology systems across EU and third countries.
Cross-sector capabilities
digital — ICT policy dialogue and international cooperation infrastructureeducation — art, design, and creative methodologies in higher education contextsmultidisciplinary — process facilitation applicable across any sector requiring structured multi-stakeholder engagement
Analysis note: Profile is based on only 2 projects, one of which received no EC funding. OCAD's institutional identity as an art and design university is a stronger signal than the thin project data alone. Expertise claims around design thinking and facilitation are well-supported by keyword evidence, but depth of scientific research capability cannot be assessed from this data. Treat as an indicative profile — sufficient for consortium matching, insufficient for deep due diligence.