SciTransfer
Organization

MICROLIFE SOLUTIONS BV

Dutch biotech SME applying microbial consortia and biocatalysis to plastic waste upcycling and PFAS removal from water systems.

Technology SMEenvironmentNLSMEThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€543K
Unique partners
41
What they do

Their core work

Microlife Solutions BV is an Amsterdam-based biotech SME that applies microbial and enzymatic processes to solve environmental pollution problems. In their first EU project, they contributed to developing biocatalytic pathways for breaking down plastic waste — using microbial consortia and mechano-biochemical methods to depolymerise plastics into reusable bioproducts and bioplastics. In their second project, they shifted application domain to tackle persistent pollutants (particularly PFAS) in water, soil, and sediment systems, bringing biological tools to contamination risk assessment and circular water reuse. Their core value to consortia is specialist knowledge in environmental microbiology and bioprocessing applied to circular economy challenges.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Microbial plastic depolymerisation and bioproduct recoveryprimary
1 project

BioICEP (2020–2024) focuses directly on using microbial consortia and mechano-biochemical processes to break down plastics and convert them into bioplastics and bioproducts.

Biocatalysis and bioprocessingprimary
1 project

BioICEP keywords include biocatalysis and bioprocessing as core technical methods alongside microbial consortium engineering.

PFAS and persistent pollutant management in water systemssecondary
1 project

PROMISCES (2021–2025) targets recalcitrant industrial chemicals including PFAS in soil-sediment-water systems, with Microlife contributing biological and toxicological tools.

Circular economy applications in water and materialssecondary
2 projects

Both BioICEP and PROMISCES explicitly target circular economy outcomes — plastic upcycling and water reuse respectively — making this a cross-cutting thread across their entire H2020 portfolio.

Environmental risk assessment and policy supportemerging
1 project

PROMISCES keywords include risk management, toxicological tools, and policy support, indicating Microlife contributes beyond lab work to regulatory-facing outputs.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Microbial plastic degradation and bioproducts
Recent focus
PFAS removal and water pollution remediation

Microlife entered H2020 in 2020 with a clear focus on biological solutions for plastic waste — microbial consortia, depolymerisation enzymes, and bioprocessing to create a circular economy for plastics. One year later, they joined a second project targeting a very different problem: PFAS and persistent industrial chemicals contaminating water bodies, with outputs that include risk frameworks and policy tools. The shift is not a departure but an expansion of the same underlying capability — applying microbial and biochemical expertise to environmental contamination — just moving from solid waste streams to liquid pollutant systems.

Microlife appears to be building a broader environmental biotech portfolio, moving from materials circular economy into water safety and zero-pollution — both high-priority areas under the EU Green Deal — suggesting they are positioning for the next wave of EU environmental research funding.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European15 countries collaborated

Microlife has participated in two projects without ever taking a coordinator role, placing them firmly in the specialist-contributor camp. Their 41 unique partners across two projects indicates they join large, multi-institution research consortia typical of H2020 RIA actions rather than small focused teams. They likely contribute a specific microbial or bioprocessing capability that complements the broader consortium's experimental or modelling work — a profile that makes them easy to onboard but means they have not yet built track record in project management or leadership.

Microlife has worked with 41 distinct partner organizations across 15 countries in just two projects, reflecting the large pan-European consortia typical of RIA funding. There is no evidence of a concentrated regional cluster — their network is broad and EU-wide by construction rather than by strategic preference.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

Microlife occupies a rare niche as a private SME bringing working microbial solutions — not just research concepts — to both solid plastic waste and liquid pollutant streams. Most environmental biotech SMEs specialize in one substrate; Microlife's portfolio spans plastics and PFAS-contaminated water, which makes them an unusual bridge between the circular materials economy and zero-pollution water policy. For a consortium builder, they offer SME flexibility and real-world applicability that academic partners often lack, particularly when the project needs to demonstrate pathways to market or scale-up.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • BioICEP
    Their largest funded project (EUR 396,875), directly targeting plastic biodegradation using microbial consortia and biocatalytic depolymerisation — a technically specific and commercially relevant application with bioplastics as the end product.
  • PROMISCES
    Addresses PFAS contamination — one of the EU's highest-priority environmental concerns in 2021–2025 — with outputs spanning toxicological tools, risk management frameworks, and policy support, giving Microlife rare exposure to the regulatory interface of environmental science.
Cross-sector capabilities
Health — PFAS human health risk assessment and toxicological tool developmentManufacturing — bioplastics production and bioprocessing scale-up from plastic wasteFood and agriculture — water reuse safety and circular resource recovery relevant to food supply chains
Analysis note: Only two projects, both started within a single year (2020–2021), with no coordinator experience and no website data. The expertise profile is internally consistent but rests on a thin evidential base. The evolution narrative is directionally valid but reflects two data points, not a sustained track record. Treat all claims as indicative, not definitive.