SciTransfer
Organization

LATVIJAS ZINATNU AKADEMIJA

Latvia's national academy of sciences, coordinating national research funding alignment with European programmes across health, energy, and agriculture.

National academy of sciencesmultidisciplinaryLVThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
4
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€50K
Unique partners
77
What they do

Their core work

The Latvian Academy of Sciences (LZA) is Latvia's principal national scientific institution, serving as a policy advisory body and coordinator of national research funding programmes. In H2020, LZA primarily acted as a national funding agency representative in ERA-NET Cofund actions, aligning Latvian research funding with European initiatives across health, energy, and agriculture. Their role is institutional — connecting Latvia's research community to pan-European funding networks — rather than performing hands-on laboratory research.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Smart grids and renewable energy integrationsecondary
1 project

Participated in ERANet SmartGridPlus supporting knowledge sharing on smart grids and renewable integration across European regions.

Translational health research coordinationsecondary
2 projects

Joined ERA-NETs for rare disease research (E-Rare-3) and translational cancer research (TRANSCAN-2).

Data-driven agricultureemerging
1 project

Participated in 4D4F (Data Driven Dairy Decisions 4 Farmers), their only project with direct EC funding (EUR 49,812).

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Health research funding alignment
Recent focus
Energy and agricultural data

LZA's H2020 participation was concentrated in 2014-2016 and focused almost entirely on ERA-NET Cofund actions representing Latvia in pan-European funding alignment. The later projects (ERANet SmartGridPlus, 4D4F) suggest a shift toward applied topics — energy systems and precision agriculture — compared to the earlier pure health research ERA-NETs. However, the small number of projects makes it difficult to identify a definitive trend.

LZA appears to be broadening from health-only ERA-NET participation toward applied domains like smart energy and digital agriculture, but activity tapered off after 2016.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European28 countries collaborated

LZA exclusively participates as a partner, never as coordinator, which is consistent with its role as a national funding body joining ERA-NET consortia. With 77 unique partners across 28 countries from just 4 projects, their network is exceptionally wide — a natural result of large ERA-NET consortia that bring together dozens of national agencies. Working with LZA means gaining a gateway to Latvia's national research funding landscape.

Despite only 4 projects, LZA has collaborated with 77 partners across 28 countries — a reflection of the large multi-national ERA-NET consortia they join. Their network spans nearly all EU member states, making them well-connected institutionally across Europe.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

LZA is not a typical research performer — it is Latvia's national academy of sciences, making it a gateway to the country's entire research ecosystem. For consortium builders, partnering with LZA provides institutional legitimacy and access to Latvian national co-funding in ERA-NET actions. Their cross-sector breadth (health, energy, agriculture) reflects a national mandate rather than narrow specialization.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • 4D4F
    Only project where LZA received direct EC funding (EUR 49,812), and a departure from their ERA-NET pattern into applied dairy farming data analytics.
  • ERANet SmartGridPlus
    Represents LZA's entry into energy sector coordination, supporting cross-regional knowledge sharing on smart grids and renewable integration.
Cross-sector capabilities
Health and rare disease research coordinationEnergy systems and smart grid policyAgricultural digitizationNational research policy and funding alignment
Analysis note: LZA's profile is based on only 4 projects (2014-2016 vintage), all as participant, with minimal direct EC funding. Their role appears institutional (national funding body in ERA-NETs) rather than research-performing. The broad topic spread reflects national mandate, not deep domain expertise. No recent H2020 activity detected after 2016 project starts.