SciTransfer
Organization

LATVIJAS LAUKU FORUMS

Latvia's national rural forum connecting farming communities to EU food system research, short supply chains, and agricultural policy co-design.

NGO / AssociationfoodLVThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€259K
Unique partners
80
What they do

Their core work

Latvijas Lauku Forums (Latvian Rural Forum) is a national-level NGO representing rural communities and farmers in Latvia, with a focus on shaping agricultural and rural development policy at both national and EU levels. In H2020 research, they contribute the practitioner's voice of organized rural civil society — bringing real farming communities into policy co-design processes and food system governance. Their H2020 participation spans collaborative rural policy development (PoliRural) and the co-creation of resilient urban-rural food systems (CITIES2030), where they provide local rural knowledge, community access, and validation from a Baltic agricultural context. They bridge the gap between large-scale EU research consortia and the people those projects are meant to serve.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

2 projects

PoliRural (2019-2022) involved future-oriented collaborative policy development for rural areas, with LLF contributing rural community representation and Latvian agricultural policy context.

Sustainable urban-rural food systemsemerging
1 project

CITIES2030 (2020-2024) focused on co-creating resilient and sustainable food systems toward FOOD2030, where LLF contributed to city-region food system design and short food supply chain governance.

Nature-based solutions in agricultureemerging
1 project

CITIES2030 keywords include nature-based solutions and ecosystem services, indicating LLF's engagement with green infrastructure and ecological approaches to food production.

Participatory policy co-creationsecondary
2 projects

Both PoliRural and CITIES2030 involve co-design methodologies, where LLF's role as a national rural representative organisation makes it a natural facilitator of farmer and community participation.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Rural policy and farming advocacy
Recent focus
Urban-rural food system resilience

LLF entered H2020 through PoliRural (2019), focused squarely on rural policy design, agricultural governance, and data-driven analysis of rural futures — including text mining approaches to policy intelligence. By their second project, CITIES2030 (2020), the focus had broadened considerably toward urban-rural food system resilience, short supply chains, nature-based solutions, ecosystem services, food security, and even blockchain technology as a traceability tool. The shift is from inward-looking rural policy advocacy toward outward-facing food system architecture that connects rural producers to urban consumers and integrates environmental sustainability into supply chain design.

LLF is moving from traditional rural policy representation toward food system sustainability and traceability, making them an increasingly relevant partner for projects that sit at the intersection of agricultural communities, short supply chains, and emerging food technologies.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European27 countries collaborated

LLF participates exclusively as a consortium partner — they have never coordinated an H2020 project — which reflects the typical role of a national advocacy NGO that contributes domain access and community legitimacy rather than research leadership. Their 80 unique partners across just two projects indicates they have been embedded in very large, broad consortia (approximately 40 organizations per project), suggesting they are selected to fill a specific "Baltic rural civil society" seat rather than being a recurring team player with fixed partners. Working with them means gaining credible access to Latvia's organized farming community and a trusted interlocutor for rural stakeholder engagement.

LLF has built a surprisingly wide European network from just two projects: 80 unique consortium partners across 27 countries, reflecting the pan-European composition of both PoliRural and CITIES2030. Their connections span research institutes, municipalities, food system actors, and rural organisations across much of the EU, with particular relevance for Baltic and Eastern European agriculture.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

As Latvia's national rural forum, LLF offers something most academic or technology partners cannot: direct, organized access to Latvian farming communities and credibility as a rural civil society voice in policy processes. For consortia that need to demonstrate genuine rural engagement, participatory validation, or Baltic country coverage in food and agriculture projects, LLF fills a specific gap that no university or research institute can replicate. Their combination of policy advocacy experience and growing exposure to food technology topics (blockchain, ecosystem services) makes them a bridge between community-level farming realities and the more technical ambitions of large EU food system projects.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • CITIES2030
    Their largest and most complex project (EUR 205,942), combining short food supply chains, nature-based solutions, and blockchain technology in a pan-European urban food systems initiative running through 2024.
  • PoliRural
    Notable for its use of text mining in rural policy analysis — an unusual methodological combination for a civil society organisation, suggesting LLF engaged with data-driven policy intelligence beyond typical advocacy work.
Cross-sector capabilities
Rural territorial development and spatial planningEnvironmental governance and ecosystem servicesDigital agriculture and food traceability (blockchain)Civil society engagement and participatory research design
Analysis note: Only two H2020 projects available, both as participant, both starting after 2019. LLF is almost certainly a well-established national organisation with substantial activity outside EU research projects, but this profile can only be grounded in the H2020 data. The expertise evolution narrative is drawn from a single keyword-set transition between two projects, so treat directional signals as indicative rather than definitive.