Both CHEurope and I-Media-Cities engage IBACN's core institutional mandate — managing and presenting cultural heritage collections — with CHEurope explicitly addressing European-scale heritage governance and policy frameworks.
ISTITUTO PER I BENI ARTISTICI CULTURALI E NATURALI DELLA REGIONE EMILIA ROMAGNA
Italian regional public authority for cultural heritage management, policy, digital archiving, and public engagement in Emilia-Romagna.
Their core work
IBACN is the official regional institute responsible for managing, cataloguing, and promoting the artistic, cultural, and natural heritage of Emilia-Romagna, one of Italy's most heritage-rich regions. In EU research, they contribute authoritative institutional knowledge on heritage governance, archive management, and public engagement — grounded in their direct administration of museums, collections, and regional heritage systems. Their EU project participation centers on how heritage is studied, digitized, governed, and made accessible to public audiences across Europe. They also bring an unusual interdisciplinary dimension, connecting heritage practice with medical humanities and audience development in ways that go beyond standard conservation or archiving work.
What they specialise in
I-Media-Cities built an innovative digital environment for research on urban and media archives, while CHEurope includes digital archives as a keyword, indicating consistent engagement with digitisation and access to heritage materials.
CHEurope's keyword set explicitly includes public outreach and audience development, reflecting IBACN's operational experience communicating heritage to broad regional and national audiences.
CHEurope — a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network — positions critical and interdisciplinary approaches to heritage studies as a core research pillar, an area where IBACN contributes institutional legitimacy and case material.
CHEurope's interdisciplinary scope explicitly lists medical humanities among its keyword areas, signalling IBACN's participation in research that connects heritage collections with health, illness narratives, and the humanities.
How they've shifted over time
IBACN's entire H2020 record consists of two projects that both launched in 2016, which makes genuine temporal evolution difficult to assess — there is no before-and-after to compare across distinct periods. What can be observed is a thematic contrast between the two projects: I-Media-Cities was applied and infrastructure-oriented, focused on building digital access tools for urban and media archives, while CHEurope was theoretical and policy-oriented, addressing how European societies define, govern, and study heritage through critical and interdisciplinary lenses. The keyword evidence all derives from CHEurope, suggesting that IBACN's documented intellectual focus — heritage policy, medical humanities, audience development — reflects engagement with broader conceptual debates in the field, not just practical archive management. Whether this represents a genuine strategic shift or simply the nature of the two consortia they joined cannot be determined from two concurrent projects alone.
IBACN appears to be moving from applied digital infrastructure work toward the social, policy, and interdisciplinary dimensions of heritage — how it is defined, governed, and communicated — which positions them for future projects at the intersection of cultural policy, digital humanities, and public engagement.
How they like to work
IBACN has never led an H2020 project, always joining as a participant — consistent with its identity as a regional public authority that brings collections, credibility, and institutional access rather than research leadership. Despite only two projects, they engaged with 45 distinct partner organisations across 12 countries, indicating they are drawn into large, internationally diverse consortia where their regional heritage expertise fills a specific role. Partners considering working with IBACN should expect a reliable specialist contributor with strong local institutional grounding, not a project driver or consortium architect.
Across just two projects, IBACN connected with 45 unique partner organisations in 12 countries — a notably broad network for such a small portfolio, reflecting participation in large multi-partner H2020 consortia. Their connections span much of Europe, though their core assets and institutional mandate remain anchored in the Emilia-Romagna region of northern Italy.
What sets them apart
IBACN occupies a distinctive position that no university or research group can replicate: it is the official public authority for cultural heritage in Emilia-Romagna, giving it direct institutional access to one of Italy's densest concentrations of artistic collections, archives, and heritage sites. For consortia working on heritage management, digital archiving, or cultural policy, this means real collections, real policy connections, and the kind of institutional legitimacy that strengthens EU project proposals. The combination of applied archive management, critical heritage research participation, and regional public authority status makes them a rare bridge between academic inquiry and heritage administration practice.
Highlights from their portfolio
- CHEuropeThe largest and longest of IBACN's two projects (EUR 258,061, 2016–2021), this MSCA Innovative Training Network is notable for its unusually broad interdisciplinary scope — spanning heritage policy, digital archives, medical humanities, and audience development — making it the richest evidence base for IBACN's intellectual range.
- I-Media-CitiesAn Innovation Action focused on building a digital environment for urban and media archive research, this project represents IBACN's applied, infrastructure-oriented side, complementing the theoretical focus of CHEurope and demonstrating capacity to contribute to practical digital tools for heritage access.