SciTransfer
Organization

INSTITUTUL NATIONAL DE CERCETARE DEZVOLTARE PENTRU MASINI SI INSTALATII DESTINATE AGRICULTURII SI INDUSTRIEI ALIMENTARE

Romanian national research institute for agricultural machinery, active in Enterprise Europe Network SME innovation support services.

Research institutefoodRONo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
4
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€47K
Unique partners
11
What they do

Their core work

INMA Bucharest is Romania's national research institute for agricultural machinery and food industry equipment. Within H2020, their participation has been exclusively through the Enterprise Europe Network (EEN), delivering SME innovation management and key account management services in Romania's RO3 region. Their EU-funded work focuses on helping SMEs improve their innovation capacity rather than conducting primary research. Their core institutional expertise lies in designing and engineering machinery for agriculture and food processing, though this does not appear in their H2020 project portfolio.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

4 projects

Every project involved EEN activities including key account management (KAM) for SMEs seeking cross-border technology partnerships.

Agricultural and food industry machinerysecondary
0 projects

Core institutional mandate per their name and legal status, but not directly reflected in any H2020 project scope.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
SME innovation management
Recent focus
SME innovation management

Their H2020 focus has remained remarkably stable — all four projects from 2015 to 2021 are continuations of the same PROSME-INN initiative supporting SME innovation management. The only visible shift is the addition of the EIMC keyword in the most recent project (2020-2021), suggesting expanded involvement in Enterprise Europe innovation management capacity-building. There is no meaningful pivot or diversification across the timeline.

They are a steady EEN service provider with no indication of branching into new thematic areas — expect continued SME support work rather than technical research collaborations.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: Local1 countries collaborated

INMA participates exclusively as a junior partner, never coordinating. With only 11 unique partners across a single country collaboration footprint, they operate within a tight, recurring consortium — the same PROSME-INN project was renewed four times with largely the same setup. This suggests a reliable but narrowly scoped partner suited for regional EEN delivery rather than broad consortium building.

Their network is very limited: 11 unique partners concentrated in a single country collaboration context, all within repeated iterations of the same EEN coordination and support action. This is a locally anchored network, not a broad European partnership base.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

INMA's distinctive value lies in combining a national research institute's credibility in agricultural and food machinery with hands-on EEN innovation support for Romanian SMEs. For consortium builders, they offer a gateway to Romania's RO3 region SME ecosystem. However, their H2020 track record is narrow and low-budget, so they are best approached for regional dissemination or SME engagement tasks rather than as a core technical partner.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • PROSME INN (2020-2021)
    Their largest grant (EUR 21,650) and most recent iteration, adding EIMC scope to their established SME innovation support work.
  • PROSME-INN (2015-2016)
    Their entry into H2020 and the first of four consecutive renewals of essentially the same EEN support action.
Cross-sector capabilities
agricultural machinery and equipmentfood processing technologySME innovation advisorytechnology transfer to rural enterprises
Analysis note: All four H2020 projects are renewals of the same PROSME-INN EEN support action with very low funding (total EUR 47,492). This profile reflects their EEN intermediary role, not their core agricultural machinery R&D capability, which is not visible in the H2020 data. The 'Energy' sector tag on three projects appears to be a metadata artifact — none of the project titles or keywords relate to energy research.