SciTransfer
Organization

INSTITUTT FOR SAMFUNNSFORSKNING

Norwegian social research institute specialising in refugee protection law, migration narratives, and asylum policy analysis for European consortia.

Research institutesocietyNONo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€615K
Unique partners
19
What they do

Their core work

The Institute for Social Research (ISF) is Norway's leading independent social science institute, conducting empirical research on migration, asylum policy, social inequality, and democratic governance. In H2020, they contributed expertise on refugee vulnerabilities, legal protection frameworks, and the social dynamics of asylum systems across Europe. Their applied research bridges academic analysis and policy practice — they study how laws, narratives, and institutions shape the lived experiences of migrants and vulnerable groups. Beyond academic output, ISF produces findings designed to inform public debate and policy decisions at national and EU level.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Migration policy and asylum systemsprimary
2 projects

Both VULNER and BRIDGES address EU asylum policy, refugee protection regimes, and the legal/social conditions facing migrants in Europe.

Refugee vulnerability and legal protectionprimary
1 project

VULNER directly investigates how international and EU law constructs, assesses, and addresses vulnerability among refugees, asylum seekers, minors, and gendered groups.

Migration narratives and policy communicationprimary
1 project

BRIDGES examines how migration narratives are produced, spread, and shape policymaking — including co-production between researchers and civil society actors.

Gender and child protection in asylum contextssecondary
1 project

VULNER explicitly lists gender and minors as research dimensions, indicating cross-cutting expertise in how protection regimes apply to specific vulnerable subgroups.

Knowledge co-production and science-policy interfaceemerging
1 project

BRIDGES introduces co-production and boundary-making as research themes, signalling a growing interest in participatory and collaborative research methodologies.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Refugee legal protection frameworks
Recent focus
Migration narratives and policy influence

In their earlier H2020 engagement (VULNER, 2020), ISF focused on the legal and structural dimensions of refugee protection — examining vulnerability categories, the Common European Asylum System, refugee camps, resettlement processes, and the specific situations of minors and women. Their more recent project (BRIDGES, 2021) shifted attention from legal frameworks to communication and influence: how migration narratives are constructed and what impact they have on policymaking and public discourse. This trajectory suggests ISF is moving from documenting legal realities to understanding and shaping how those realities are perceived and acted upon — a move from diagnosis toward influence.

ISF appears to be expanding from structural legal analysis toward narrative research and science-policy co-production, making them a strong candidate for projects that need both empirical rigor and policy communication expertise.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European9 countries collaborated

ISF has participated exclusively as a consortium partner across both projects — they have not coordinated any H2020 work, which is consistent with their profile as a specialist contributor bringing deep thematic expertise rather than project management capacity. Their 19 unique partners across 9 countries across just 2 projects suggests they work within medium-to-large international consortia, likely selected for their Norwegian perspective and social science depth rather than as generalist partners.

ISF has built a network of 19 distinct consortium partners across 9 countries through only two projects — a relatively broad geographic spread for a small portfolio, suggesting they operate in well-connected European research consortia. Their Norwegian base provides value in projects seeking Nordic policy perspectives or Scandinavian case studies.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

ISF sits at a rare intersection: rigorous empirical social science combined with direct policy relevance, based in Norway — a country with significant experience in refugee resettlement and asylum policy outside the EU but deeply embedded in European research networks. For consortia building projects on migration, asylum, or social vulnerability, ISF offers both the academic credibility of an established research institute and the practical policy connection of an organization whose work informs Norwegian and EU governance. Their growing focus on narrative research and co-production makes them particularly useful in projects that need to go beyond data to affect how issues are framed publicly.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • VULNER
    The largest-funded project in ISF's H2020 portfolio (EUR 400,754), examining how EU and international law defines and responds to vulnerability across refugee camps, resettlement programs, and gendered and minor-specific protection categories.
  • BRIDGES
    Represents ISF's emerging focus on narrative impact and co-production — studying how migration stories are constructed and used to influence EU policymaking, bridging social science research with communication and advocacy practice.
Cross-sector capabilities
security (border management, asylum administration)health (mental health and wellbeing of refugee populations)education (integration and social inclusion research)digital (digital narratives, online migration discourse)
Analysis note: Only 2 projects with a narrow thematic range and no coordinator experience — enough to identify a clear specialisation in migration and social policy research, but insufficient to assess organisational capacity, methodological breadth, or network loyalty. Confidence is limited by the small portfolio size rather than data quality.