SciTransfer
Organization

INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT BV

Dutch health economics consultancy specializing in medical technology assessment, cost-outcome modelling, and personalized medicine economic evaluation.

Innovation consultancyhealthNLNo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
3
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€1.2M
Unique partners
16
What they do

Their core work

iMTA is a Rotterdam-based health economics consultancy specializing in medical technology assessment, cost-effectiveness analysis, and health policy modelling. They evaluate whether medical interventions deliver value for money by comparing costs and outcomes across treatments, healthcare systems, and patient populations. Their work directly informs reimbursement decisions, clinical guidelines, and pharmaceutical pricing strategies across Europe. They bring economic modelling and decision-analytic expertise to multi-country research consortia studying chronic disease management and personalized medicine.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Health technology assessment and cost-outcome analysisprimary
3 projects

Core to all three projects — COMED explicitly pushes boundaries of cost and outcome analysis of medical technologies.

Health economic modelling and simulationprimary
2 projects

HEcoPerMed focuses on healthcare- and pharma-economic models; keywords include modelling and simulation.

Comparative effectiveness of self-management interventionssecondary
1 project

COMPAR-EU compared self-management interventions across four chronic diseases using network meta-analysis.

Personalized medicine economicsemerging
1 project

HEcoPerMed developed economic models specifically to support the International Consortium for Personalised Medicine.

Network meta-analysis and evidence synthesissecondary
1 project

COMPAR-EU applied network meta-analysis methods to compare interventions across chronic diseases.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Cost-outcome analysis
Recent focus
Personalized medicine economics

With only three projects starting between 2018 and 2019, the timeline is too short to identify a dramatic evolution. However, a clear thematic progression is visible: from broad cost-outcome analysis of medical technologies (COMED, where they served as a third party) toward more specialized health economic modelling for personalized medicine (HEcoPerMed). Their trajectory suggests a move from traditional HTA methods toward forward-looking simulation and future-studies approaches tailored to emerging precision medicine frameworks.

Moving toward economic evaluation of personalized and precision medicine, positioning them at the intersection of HTA and individualized treatment decision-making.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European10 countries collaborated

iMTA consistently operates as a specialist contributor rather than a project leader — they have never coordinated a project and participated once as a third party. They work within medium-to-large consortia, connecting with 16 unique partners across 10 countries from just three projects. This pattern indicates they are brought in specifically for their health economics and modelling expertise, functioning as a trusted methodological partner rather than a project driver.

Despite a small project portfolio, iMTA has built a broad European network spanning 16 partners across 10 countries, reflecting the multi-country nature of health system comparison studies. Their Rotterdam base and Dutch affiliation place them centrally within European health policy networks.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

iMTA occupies a niche as a private-sector health economics consultancy that bridges academic rigour with practical policy impact — unusual in a landscape dominated by university-embedded HTA groups. Their ability to model costs and outcomes across different healthcare systems makes them a valuable partner for any consortium that needs to demonstrate economic viability or inform reimbursement policy. For coordinators building health-related proposals, they offer dedicated HTA work package capacity without the overhead of engaging a full university department.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • COMPAR-EU
    Largest funding share (EUR 776,600) — ambitious multi-country comparison of self-management interventions across four chronic diseases.
  • HEcoPerMed
    Positions iMTA at the frontier of personalized medicine economics, linking health policy modelling with the ICPerMed initiative.
Cross-sector capabilities
Pharmaceutical pricing and market access strategySocial policy and welfare system modellingDigital health intervention evaluationAging and chronic disease management economics
Analysis note: Profile based on only 3 H2020 projects within a narrow 2018-2019 window. The organization name strongly suggests this is iMTA (affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam), a well-known HTA group, but this profile is limited to what the CORDIS data shows. No website provided for verification. One project (COMED) was a third-party role with no recorded EC funding, further limiting insight. Evolution analysis should be treated cautiously given the compressed timeline.