SciTransfer
Organization

INSTITUT FUER LAENDLICHE STRUKTURFORSCHUNG EV

German rural research institute specialising in farming systems analysis, participatory methods, and agricultural policy — active in large EU agri-food consortia.

Research institutefoodDESMEThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€549K
Unique partners
32
What they do

Their core work

IFLS is a Frankfurt-based research institute specialising in the socio-economic and structural analysis of rural areas and farming systems in Germany and Europe. Their core work bridges agricultural science and public policy: they study how farming practices, land management decisions, and rural structures respond to economic pressures and regulatory frameworks. In EU projects, they contribute participatory research methods — working directly with farming communities to co-develop decision-support tools and test whether new approaches are actually acceptable and usable in practice. They sit at the intersection of agricultural economics, rural sociology, and policy analysis, making them a translator between research findings and real-world farm-level implementation.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Rural socio-economic analysis and farming systemsprimary
2 projects

Both PEGASUS and MIXED rely on IFLS for understanding the economic and structural conditions under which farmers operate and make decisions.

Participatory action research with farming communitiesprimary
1 project

MIXED (2020–2025) explicitly lists participatory action research and user acceptability as core methodological contributions from IFLS.

Ecosystem goods and services from agricultural landsecondary
1 project

PEGASUS (2015–2018) focused on unlocking synergies between land management and public ecosystem services, a topic requiring socio-economic framing alongside ecological science.

Agricultural policy development and stakeholder dialoguesecondary
1 project

MIXED keywords include policy development and dialogue and dissemination, indicating IFLS contributes to translating research results into policy-relevant recommendations.

Decision-support tools for mixed farming and agroforestryemerging
1 project

MIXED lists decision-support tools and improved performance among its outputs, suggesting IFLS is moving toward applied tool development for farm-level use.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Ecosystem services, land management policy
Recent focus
Mixed farming, participatory co-development

In their first H2020 project (PEGASUS, 2015–2018), IFLS worked on the policy and economic dimensions of ecosystem services from land — a relatively broad, landscape-level framing with little farm-specific focus evident in the available data. By their second project (MIXED, 2020–2025), the focus had sharpened considerably: they moved toward mixed farming systems and agroforestry, with a strong emphasis on participatory methods, co-development with farmers, and the practical usability of research outputs. The shift is from studying land systems at a distance to working alongside farming communities to make research actionable.

IFLS is moving toward applied, farmer-facing research — their most recent work centres on making agricultural science usable in practice, which positions them well for multi-actor projects that need to demonstrate real-world uptake and policy impact.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European15 countries collaborated

IFLS has participated in both projects as a partner, never as coordinator — a consistent pattern even across a five-year gap between projects. With 32 unique partners across 15 countries from just two projects, they operate in large, internationally diverse RIA consortia rather than tight bilateral partnerships. This suggests they are a reliable specialist contributor that larger project leaders bring in for their socio-economic and participatory research capacity, rather than an organisation that drives project direction itself.

IFLS has built a network of 32 unique consortium partners across 15 countries through only two projects — an unusually broad reach for such a small portfolio, indicating they consistently join large, pan-European RIA consortia. Their geographic spread suggests strong connections across Western and Central European agricultural research communities.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

IFLS occupies a rare niche as a small, SME-classified research institute that brings rigorous socio-economic and rural structural analysis into large EU agricultural consortia — a profile more commonly held by universities or large think tanks. Their Frankfurt base and German agricultural policy expertise give them credibility in Germany's large farming sector, while their participatory research methods make them valuable in any project that must demonstrate real farmer engagement and policy uptake. For consortium builders, they offer a combination of academic rigour and practical field access that few institutes of their size can match.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • MIXED
    Their largest and most recent project (EUR 280,500, running to 2025) covers mixed farming and agroforestry with a multi-actor, transdisciplinary approach — IFLS's most technically specific contribution to date, with clear deliverables around decision tools and policy impact.
  • PEGASUS
    IFLS's first H2020 appearance tackled the economically and politically complex question of how to value and unlock ecosystem services from farmland — an early signal of their interest in the policy-science interface in agriculture.
Cross-sector capabilities
Environmental policy and ecosystem services valuationRural land use and landscape governanceAgricultural socio-economics for climate adaptation policy
Analysis note: Only 2 projects in the dataset, and the earlier project (PEGASUS) carries no keywords in the computed analytics, limiting the early-vs-recent keyword comparison. The profile is directionally sound but built on a thin evidence base — treat expertise claims as indicative, not definitive. A review of IFLS's own publications or national research database entries would significantly strengthen this profile.