SciTransfer
Organization

ICON CLINICAL RESEARCH SRO

Czech subsidiary of a global CRO running Phase II-III ATMP clinical trials, with specific experience in placenta-derived cell therapy for orthopaedic indications.

Large industrial companyhealthCZNo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
Unique partners
20
What they do

Their core work

ICON Clinical Research SRO is the Czech Republic subsidiary of ICON plc, one of the world's five largest Contract Research Organizations (CROs). Their core business is clinical trial management and operations — they are hired by pharmaceutical and biotech clients to plan, run, and report clinical studies according to GCP and regulatory requirements. In H2020 projects, ICON appeared as a contracted third-party clinical operations partner, not as a primary research institution: they handled the trial execution while the science was led by others. Both of their EU research project involvements center on the same PLX-PAD placenta-derived stromal cell therapy, suggesting they were the designated CRO for that specific drug development program across its Phase IIb and Phase III stages.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Clinical trial operations and CRO servicesprimary
2 projects

Both PACE and HIPGEN projects list ICON as third-party clinical operator, consistent with a contracted CRO running multicenter trial logistics, monitoring, and reporting.

Cell therapy and ATMP clinical developmentprimary
2 projects

Both projects involve PLX-PAD (ex-vivo expanded placenta-derived stromal cells), an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product with complex handling and regulatory requirements.

Orthopaedic and trauma clinical researchsecondary
1 project

HIPGEN specifically targets hip fracture recovery and muscle regeneration in orthopaedic surgery patients, a defined therapeutic indication ICON supported through Phase III.

Late-stage (Phase II-III) pivotal trial managementsecondary
2 projects

PACE was Phase IIb and HIPGEN progressed to Phase III — ICON managed both, indicating experience with pivotal-level regulatory trials rather than early exploratory studies.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Phase IIb placental stromal cell study
Recent focus
Phase III orthopaedic cell therapy trial

ICON's two H2020 projects represent a single clinical development arc rather than two distinct research directions: PACE (2017–2021, Phase IIb) and HIPGEN (2018–2022, Phase III) both involve the same PLX-PAD therapy, with ICON supporting the program as it advanced toward regulatory approval. The absence of early keywords from PACE and the concentration of all keywords in HIPGEN reflects that the Phase III trial was the more defined, protocol-mature study — not a change in focus but a deepening of the same therapeutic area. With only two overlapping projects on a single platform, it is not possible to identify a broader strategic shift in ICON's H2020 portfolio.

ICON's H2020 footprint tracks the clinical maturation of a single ATMP program from proof-of-concept to pivotal trial, positioning them as an experienced CRO for late-stage Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product development in the EU regulatory environment.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: third_party_expertReach: European10 countries collaborated

ICON does not lead consortia or drive research agendas — in both H2020 projects they appear exclusively as a contracted third party, a structural role that reflects how CROs typically engage with publicly-funded research: as execution specialists hired by the consortium, not co-investigators. Despite only two projects, they connected with 20 distinct partners across 10 countries, which mirrors the multinational, multi-site nature of Phase II-III clinical trials where each participating hospital or clinic counts as a network node. This means working with ICON means engaging a service provider with defined deliverables, not a scientific collaborator sharing intellectual risk.

Through just two projects, ICON touched 20 distinct consortium partners across 10 countries — an unusually broad network for such a small project count, explained by the multinational clinical site structures required for Phase II-III trials. Their geographic footprint likely spans major EU clinical research hubs, with the Czech entity serving as the Central and Eastern European operational anchor.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

As the Czech arm of a global top-5 CRO, ICON SRO brings enterprise-grade GCP infrastructure, regulatory affairs expertise, and multinational trial coordination to EU research consortia — capabilities rarely available from academic or SME partners. Their specific track record with ATMPs (Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products) is particularly valuable: cell and gene therapy trials carry far higher operational complexity than conventional drug trials, and regulators scrutinize CRO competence closely. For a consortium building a clinical work package around an innovative cell therapy, ICON CZ offers a credible, accredited execution partner with direct experience in exactly this product class.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • HIPGEN
    A pivotal Phase III trial — the highest clinical evidence level before market authorization — targeting hip fracture recovery in elderly patients using PLX-PAD cell therapy, representing ICON's most advanced and regulatory-consequential EU research role.
  • PACE
    The Phase IIb precursor to HIPGEN, this multicenter study using HLA-unmatched allogeneic placental stromal cells was an early proof-of-concept for an ATMP that ICON then carried through to Phase III, demonstrating continuity across a full late-stage clinical development program.
Cross-sector capabilities
Regenerative medicine manufacturing quality (ATMP production and handling)Elderly care and geriatric medicine clinical researchOrthopaedic medical device and combination product trials
Analysis note: ICON SRO is the Czech subsidiary of ICON plc (a global top-5 CRO with ~40,000 employees), but both H2020 involvements are as contracted third-party clinical site operator for a single PLX-PAD therapy program — not independent research contributions. The profile reflects their execution role within one therapeutic program, not their full CRO service range. Confidence is low (2) due to only 2 projects on a single platform, no EC funding data, and no coordinator or participant roles to assess independent research capacity.