SciTransfer
Organization

FUNDACION DE LA INGENIERIA CIVIL DE GALICIA

Spanish civil engineering foundation specializing in aeroacoustics, combustion emissions modeling, and environmental analysis for high-speed and supersonic aviation.

Research institutetransportESThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€415K
Unique partners
19
What they do

Their core work

The Foundation of Civil Engineering of Galicia (FICG) is a Spanish research body that applies engineering analysis and modeling expertise to advanced aviation challenges, particularly high-speed and supersonic flight. Their technical work covers aeroacoustic modeling (jet-noise and sonic-boom prediction), combustion analysis, and pollutant emissions assessment for next-generation aircraft. FICG operates as a specialist partner in large European research consortia, contributing validated modeling tools and test campaign analysis. Their civil engineering background gives them a distinctive environmental impact lens — treating noise, emissions, and infrastructure-level consequences as first-class technical concerns, not afterthoughts.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Aeroacoustics and noise modeling (sonic boom, jet noise)primary
1 project

MOREandLESS explicitly lists sonic-boom and jet-noise as key technical domains, with modelling activities and test campaigns named as primary deliverables.

Combustion and pollutant emissions analysisprimary
1 project

MOREandLESS keywords include combustion and pollutant emissions modelling as explicit areas of technical contribution within the environmental sustainability workstream.

High-speed and supersonic aviation researchprimary
2 projects

Both STRATOFLY (stratospheric high-speed propulsion) and MOREandLESS (low-boom supersonic aviation) place FICG squarely in the high-speed flight research domain.

Alternative aviation fuels — biofuels and liquid hydrogenemerging
1 project

MOREandLESS explicitly references biofuels and liquid hydrogen as research topics within a project focused on environmentally sustainable supersonic aviation.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Stratospheric high-speed propulsion
Recent focus
Sustainable supersonic noise and emissions

FICG entered H2020 through STRATOFLY (2018–2021), a broad exploration of stratospheric flight and high-speed propulsion concepts — an exploratory phase with no specific keyword signature, suggesting a wide supporting role. Their second project, MOREandLESS (2021–2025), shows a sharp narrowing toward concrete technical deliverables: aeroacoustic test campaigns, combustion modeling, emissions reduction, and alternative fuels including liquid hydrogen. The trajectory points clearly toward environmental performance and regulatory compliance for supersonic aviation — a niche growing in importance as the EU tightens aviation emissions standards and low-boom certification frameworks emerge.

FICG is moving from broad aerospace participation toward specialized environmental performance modeling for supersonic aircraft — a technically narrow but strategically important position as EU aviation regulations and low-boom certification standards tighten.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European10 countries collaborated

FICG operates exclusively as a consortium partner across both H2020 projects — never as project coordinator — which signals a preference or capacity for focused technical contribution over administrative leadership. With 19 distinct partners across 10 countries from just two projects, they clearly work in large, multi-stakeholder research programs rather than small bilateral teams. This pattern suggests they bring a specific, bounded technical capability that large consortia need to fill a specialist gap, without requiring them to manage the project.

FICG has accumulated 19 unique consortium partners across 10 countries from only two projects, indicating participation in large, pan-European research programs — likely alongside major aerospace research institutes, universities, and industry players. Their network is broad relative to their project count, suggesting they entered well-connected programs from the start.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

FICG is unusual in being a civil engineering foundation — not an aerospace institute or university aeronautics department — working at the frontier of supersonic aviation research. This cross-domain background likely explains their specific niche: environmental impact assessment, noise analysis, and regulatory-aligned modeling that mainstream aerospace groups treat as secondary. For consortium builders seeking geographic diversity (Galicia, NW Spain) and a civil engineering perspective on high-speed flight environmental performance, FICG fills a gap that few comparable organizations cover.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • STRATOFLY
    Their largest project by EC funding (EUR 315,000) and first H2020 entry, focused on the technically ambitious domain of stratospheric high-speed propulsion — placing FICG among a select European group exploring hypersonic aircraft concepts.
  • MOREandLESS
    Combines regulatory framework development with environmental performance modeling for supersonic aviation, positioning FICG at the intersection of aerospace engineering and EU sustainability compliance — a combination with growing commercial relevance as supersonic aircraft approach certification.
Cross-sector capabilities
Environment — noise and emissions modeling transferable to infrastructure and urban planning impact assessmentsEnergy — alternative aviation fuels research (biofuels, liquid hydrogen) overlaps with clean energy transition programsSpace — stratospheric flight research intersects with sub-orbital and space access corridor studies
Analysis note: Only 2 projects with thin keyword data — STRATOFLY carries no keywords at all, so the profile rests almost entirely on MOREandLESS. The org type (civil engineering foundation with REC classification) is unusual for an aerospace research role; actual internal research capacity, staff size, and precise technical mandate are unknown. Expertise claims should be treated as directional indicators based on project participation, not confirmed primary specializations. A direct review of FICG's website or CORDIS project reports would materially improve confidence.