SciTransfer
Organization

FACULDADE DE CIENCIAS DA UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA

Lisbon's Faculty of Sciences providing specialist natural science expertise — from semiconductor physics to environmental monitoring — as third-party contributor across diverse EU consortia.

University research groupmultidisciplinaryPT
H2020 projects
33
As coordinator
1
Total EC funding
€2.4M
Unique partners
407
What they do

Their core work

The Faculty of Sciences at the University of Lisbon is a broad-spectrum natural sciences faculty covering physics, biology, geology, chemistry, computer science, and environmental sciences. In H2020, they contributed specialized scientific expertise — from semiconductor nanostructures and terahertz transceivers to biodiversity informatics and earth observation — almost exclusively as a third-party contributor linked to larger Portuguese research units. Their strength lies in deep disciplinary knowledge across natural and computational sciences, applied to domains ranging from border security systems to sustainable agriculture and digital health endpoints.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Semiconductor physics and terahertz communicationssecondary
2 projects

iBROW (resonant tunnelling diodes, mm-wave transceivers) and ChipAI (quantum resonant tunnelling, nanoscale lasers) demonstrate sustained expertise in semiconductor nanostructures.

Environmental monitoring and water managementprimary
5 projects

CERTO (water quality via Copernicus), SOILdarity and SustInAfrica (water/land management), eLTER PPP (ecosystem research infrastructure), and MINATURA 2020 (minerals framework) span environmental observation and resource management.

Cybersecurity and dependable computingsecondary
4 projects

SUPERCLOUD (cloud security), DiSIEM (security information management), ADMORPH (fault-tolerant cyber-physical systems), and DIVA (digitech value chains) cover security and resilient systems.

Natural science collections and biodiversity dataemerging
2 projects

DiSSCo Prepare (distributed scientific collections infrastructure) and CIRCLES (microbiome-based food systems) reflect growing work in biodiversity data and biological collections.

History of science and earth observationsecondary
1 project

RUTTER — their only coordinator project and an ERC grant (€2M) — reconstructs global environmental history through early modern nautical records, a distinctive niche.

Digital health and clinical endpointsemerging
2 projects

IDEA-FAST (digital endpoints for fatigue/sleep in inflammatory disorders) and HIT-CF (personalised cystic fibrosis treatment) show growing involvement in health data and clinical research.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Semiconductors, security, cloud computing
Recent focus
Environment, open science, digital health

In 2015–2018, the faculty's H2020 work centred on semiconductor devices (terahertz transceivers, resonant tunnelling diodes), cloud security, and border surveillance command-and-control systems — reflecting its physics and computer science strengths. From 2019 onward, the focus shifted markedly toward environmental research (water management, soil science, ecosystem monitoring), biodiversity data infrastructure, and digital health, alongside a prestigious ERC grant on the history of global navigation and climate. The trend is away from hardware-centric ICT and toward environmental sciences, open science infrastructure, and interdisciplinary research combining natural sciences with societal challenges.

Moving toward environmental monitoring, biodiversity data infrastructure, and open science — positioning themselves as a natural sciences hub for sustainability-oriented EU research.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: third_party_expertReach: Global43 countries collaborated

Overwhelmingly a third-party contributor (34 of 37 participations), meaning they provide specialized expertise through a host institution rather than leading or even formally partnering in most projects. They coordinated only one project — the ERC-funded RUTTER — which reflects individual PI excellence rather than institutional consortium-building capacity. With 407 unique partners across 43 countries, their reach is wide but shallow: they plug into many consortia as a knowledge provider rather than serving as a network hub.

Connected to 407 unique partners across 43 countries, reflecting the breadth of consortia they contribute to as a third party. Their network spans all of Europe with significant connections to Africa through projects like SustInAfrica and ABC 21.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

As a full Faculty of Sciences, they offer rare disciplinary breadth — from quantum semiconductor physics to geology to marine sciences — within a single institutional unit. Their almost-exclusive third-party role means they are easy to bring into a consortium for targeted scientific input without the overhead of formal partnership negotiations. The ERC-funded RUTTER project demonstrates capacity for world-class original research at the intersection of environmental history and earth observation, a genuinely unusual niche in the Portuguese research landscape.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • RUTTER
    Their only coordinator role — a €2M ERC Consolidator Grant reconstructing global climate and environmental history through early modern nautical records, signalling top-tier individual research excellence.
  • DiSSCo Prepare
    Part of the EU-wide effort to build distributed infrastructure for natural science collections — positions the faculty at the heart of Europe's biodiversity data ecosystem.
  • IDEA-FAST
    Large-scale IMI-style project developing digital health endpoints for neurodegenerative and inflammatory diseases, representing their expanding reach into clinical digital health.
Cross-sector capabilities
digitalenvironmenthealthsecurity
Analysis note: Profile confidence is moderate: while 37 project participations provide reasonable coverage, 34 are third-party roles with no direct EC funding, limiting insight into the faculty's own strategic priorities versus simply hosting researchers linked to other institutions. The extreme diversity of topics reflects a broad faculty rather than a focused research strategy, making it harder to characterize a clear institutional identity.