SciTransfer
Organization

EUROPEAN COUNCIL ON REFUGEES AND EXILES AISBL

Pan-European NGO alliance bringing asylum law expertise and civil society access to EU migration and refugee protection research consortia.

NGO / AssociationsocietyBENo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€229K
Unique partners
21
What they do

Their core work

ECRE is a pan-European alliance of NGOs working on refugee protection, asylum law, and EU migration policy. In research consortia, they contribute civil society expertise, policy analysis, and direct knowledge of how asylum systems function in practice — bridging the gap between academic research and the lived experience of refugees and the organisations that serve them. Their H2020 work focused on evaluating and reforming the Common European Asylum System (CEAS), combining legal analysis with NGO field intelligence. They are not a think-tank producing abstract reports; they are practitioners who advocate, litigate, and operate within asylum systems across Europe.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

European asylum law and CEAS reformprimary
2 projects

Both CEASEVAL and ReSOMA directly address the Common European Asylum System, its legal framework, and reform pathways.

Migration and asylum policy researchprimary
2 projects

ReSOMA explicitly built a research-practice platform on migration and asylum, while CEASEVAL delivered policy recommendations grounded in empirical evaluation.

Civil society and NGO network mobilisationprimary
2 projects

As a pan-European alliance of NGOs, ECRE brings organized civil society perspectives and field-level data that academic partners cannot generate alone.

Reception conditions and refugee protection standardssecondary
2 projects

CEASEVAL's scope covered reception, procedures, and protection standards — areas where ECRE has direct operational member expertise across EU member states.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
asylum system evaluation
Recent focus
migration research platform development

ECRE's H2020 participation spans only 2017–2020 with two closely related projects, making a meaningful evolution analysis difficult. Both projects sit squarely within the same thematic space — asylum system evaluation and migration research infrastructure — suggesting a deliberate, focused engagement with EU-funded research rather than a broadening portfolio. There is no visible pivot or expansion; ECRE entered H2020 with a clear purpose and stayed consistent with it.

ECRE's trajectory points toward institutionalising research-practice links in migration governance — ReSOMA's platform model suggests they are interested in becoming a durable infrastructure node for migration research, not just a one-off project participant.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European13 countries collaborated

ECRE has never led an H2020 project, consistently joining as a participant — a pattern consistent with an advocacy organisation that contributes domain expertise and civil society legitimacy rather than research management capacity. Their two projects together involved 21 distinct consortium partners across 13 countries, indicating participation in large, multidisciplinary consortia rather than tight bilateral partnerships. For prospective collaborators, this means ECRE is a valued specialist contributor, not a project driver.

ECRE has built connections with 21 partners across 13 countries through just two projects, reflecting the broad, multinational consortia typical of EU migration research. Their network spans academic institutions, research centres, and other civil society organisations across the EU, consistent with their role as a pan-European membership alliance.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

ECRE is one of the few organisations in Europe that combines legal expertise in asylum law with a direct membership network of frontline NGOs operating in dozens of countries — a combination that gives research consortia both normative authority and real-world access to data and case knowledge. No academic institution can replicate this: ECRE's members are inside the asylum system, not studying it from the outside. For any consortium working on migration governance, forced displacement, or refugee protection, ECRE provides the civil society legitimacy and practitioner grounding that reviewers and funders expect.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • CEASEVAL
    The largest of ECRE's H2020 projects (EUR 133,500), this was a direct evaluation of the Common European Asylum System under pressure — a high-profile policy question with direct legislative implications for EU reform debates.
  • ReSOMA
    Rather than producing a single research output, this project built a living research-practice platform on migration and asylum, positioning ECRE as an ongoing infrastructure node connecting researchers and civil society actors.
Cross-sector capabilities
security and border governancesocial inclusion and integration policyEU institutional and legal affairsdigital platforms for research dissemination
Analysis note: Only 2 projects with no keyword or sector metadata available. ECRE's real-world profile is well-established and publicly documented, but this analysis is constrained to what the CORDIS data reveals — a narrow slice of a larger organisation. The expertise assessment is reliable given the clarity of both project titles and ECRE's known mandate, but the evolution and trend analysis are speculative given the limited timeline and near-identical thematic focus of both projects.