SciTransfer
Organization

ELLINIKH ENOSH DHMOSIOGRAFON EPISTHMHS, SYGGRAFEON EPISTHMHS KAI EIKOINONIOLOGON EPISTHMHS ASTIKI ETAIREIA

Greek professional association of science journalists and communicators; specialist in public engagement, science education, and research-society dialogue.

NGO / AssociationsocietyELNo active H2020 projectsThin data (2/5)
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€392K
Unique partners
41
What they do

Their core work

Science View Hellenic Association is Greece's professional body for science journalists, science writers, and science communicators — making them one of the few EU H2020 participants whose core competency is translating research into public language rather than producing the research itself. In the NUCLEUS project they contributed to rethinking how universities communicate with and engage broader society, working on governance frameworks for participatory science. In the Open Schools for Open Societies (OSOS) project they helped connect formal science education with real research environments, building science capital among young people. Their practical value to any consortium is media production capacity, journalist networks, public narrative skills, and the ability to reach non-specialist audiences in Greece and beyond.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Science education in schools and informal settingsprimary
1 project

OSOS (Open Schools for Open Societies) focused on connecting school environments with open science practices and building science capital in young learners.

Research governance and transdisciplinary engagementsecondary
1 project

NUCLEUS addressed governance frameworks for how universities communicate and engage with society, requiring expertise in bridging institutional and public spheres.

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) disseminationsecondary
2 projects

Both projects sit within the Science with and for Society (SwafS) programme, and the Association contributed the communication and societal engagement components in both cases.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
University public engagement and governance
Recent focus
Open schools and youth science literacy

In their first project (NUCLEUS, 2015), the Association focused on adult and institutional audiences — university engagement, governance structures, and transdisciplinary research practices, reflecting a top-down approach to science-society relationships. By their second project (OSOS, 2017), the focus had shifted clearly toward younger audiences and schools: science capital, science education and careers, and the concept of the responsible citizen point to a bottom-up, youth-oriented engagement strategy. The trajectory suggests a deliberate move from reforming how institutions communicate to building science literacy and curiosity at the grassroots level.

Their shift from institutional engagement to school-based science education suggests future work is likely to focus on science literacy programmes, teacher training, informal science learning, and youth-facing citizen science initiatives.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: European20 countries collaborated

The Association has never coordinated an H2020 project — both participations were as consortium member, which is typical for specialist communication partners rather than research leaders. Despite the small project count, they connected with 41 unique partners across 20 countries, indicating that they operate comfortably in large, geographically diverse European consortia. Their consistent presence in CSA (Coordination and Support Action) projects confirms their role as an enabler and disseminator, not a technical research producer — they are brought in to ensure research reaches its intended societal audiences.

Through two projects they built connections with 41 unique consortium partners spread across 20 countries, a broad reach that reflects the pan-European nature of Science with and for Society programmes. There is no evidence of a narrow geographic focus — their network spans the EU science communication and education landscape.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

Unlike universities or research institutes that add a communication task as an afterthought, Science View is an association whose entire professional identity is science communication — their members are the journalists and writers who actually produce public science content in Greece. This makes them a credible dissemination partner with existing media channels and professional networks that academic partners cannot replicate. For any consortium that needs genuine public reach in Greece, or that wants a partner who can train researchers in science communication, they offer something distinct from a standard academic communications office.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • OSOS
    The larger of their two projects (€262,500), Open Schools for Open Societies represents their clearest standalone contribution — embedding open science practices and science capital development directly into school environments across Europe.
  • NUCLEUS
    An early, ambitious project tackling how universities reshape their relationship with society through governance reform and transdisciplinary engagement, signalling the Association's capacity to work on structural rather than purely communicative challenges.
Cross-sector capabilities
Education and training (formal and informal science learning)Digital communication and media productionResearch dissemination for any technical sector needing public outreachCitizen engagement for environment, health, or energy projects with societal dimensions
Analysis note: Only two projects and no coordinator experience limits depth of analysis. The organization's identity is clear from its name (professional association of science journalists/writers/communicators) and project keywords, but there is no data on outputs, reach, membership size, or national media presence. Expertise claims are grounded only in project participation roles — actual deliverables and impact within those projects are unknown. Profile should be treated as indicative rather than definitive.