SciTransfer
Organization

CALIX LTD

Australian technology SME with proprietary Direct Separation process for low-cost CO2 capture from cement and lime kilns.

Technology SMEenergyAUSME
H2020 projects
2
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
Unique partners
27
What they do

Their core work

Calix is an Australian industrial technology company that developed the "Direct Separation" calcining process — a proprietary reactor design that restructures lime and cement kilns so that process CO2 released during limestone calcination is captured as a pure, ready-for-storage stream, without mixing with combustion flue gases. This approach sidesteps the expense of bolt-on post-combustion capture systems and makes CO2 capture economically viable for two of the hardest industries to decarbonize. The EU's LEILAC project series was specifically constructed to test this technology at European industrial scale, first as a pilot and later at demonstration scale, confirming that Calix's process is the technological core around which the consortium was built. As an Australian SME participating in H2020, they are an unusual case: their inclusion was justified by the uniqueness of their technology, not by geography.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

Direct Separation calcining technologyprimary
2 projects

Both LEILAC (2016) and LEILAC2 (2020) are built around testing and scaling Calix's proprietary calciner design for CO2 separation in lime and cement kilns.

Industrial CO2 capture from cement and limeprimary
2 projects

LEILAC and LEILAC2 both target CO2 emissions from lime and Portland cement manufacture as their explicit decarbonization goal.

Low-cost carbon capture process engineeringprimary
2 projects

LEILAC2 keywords explicitly frame the technology around 'low cost carbon capture' and 'minimal process change', reflecting a mature cost-reduction narrative.

CCUS and CO2 infrastructure integrationemerging
1 project

LEILAC2 (2020–2026) introduces keywords 'CO2 hub', 'CCUS', and 'CCS', signalling a shift toward positioning the capture output within broader storage and utilization networks.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Direct Separation pilot validation
Recent focus
Low-cost CCUS demonstration scale

In the first phase (LEILAC, 2016–2021), Calix's EU work was entirely focused on a single technical question: can the Direct Separation calcining process physically isolate CO2 at pilot scale in real cement and lime facilities? The keyword profile is almost entirely about the mechanism itself — "calcining technology", "eliminate carbon dioxide emissions", "low capital and operating cost". By LEILAC2 (2020–2026), that question appears answered: the vocabulary shifts to "CO2 hub", "CCUS", "CCS", and "low cost carbon capture" — the language of commercial deployment and infrastructure integration rather than laboratory proof. The trajectory is unambiguous: from technology validation to building the commercial and policy case for widespread industrial adoption.

Calix is moving toward commercial deployment readiness — future collaboration opportunities are most likely in industrial decarbonization clusters, CO2 transport and storage infrastructure projects, and policy-facing initiatives that need a credible low-cost capture technology anchor.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: specialist_contributorReach: Global10 countries collaborated

Calix does not lead EU projects — they have been a participant in both their H2020 engagements — but this understates their centrality: the LEILAC project series exists specifically to test their proprietary technology, making them the de facto technology anchor around which the consortium is structured. They engage within large, multi-country consortia (27 partners across 10 countries from just two projects), consistent with the scale of industrial demonstration programs in the energy sector. Working with Calix means engaging with a company that is protective of its core IP but willing to open it up for collaborative validation at European industrial scale.

Across two projects, Calix has built direct working relationships with 27 partners in 10 countries, spanning European cement producers, industrial research institutes, and process engineering firms — a concentrated but high-quality network at the heart of the European industrial decarbonization ecosystem. As an Australian company, their cross-continental reach is notable and reflects the uniqueness of their technology position.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

Calix is exceptionally rare among H2020 participants: an Australian SME whose technology was judged important enough that EU-funded research was structured around proving it works. In the cement and lime decarbonization space, their Direct Separation approach is genuinely differentiated — it avoids the major capital cost of post-combustion retrofit by capturing CO2 at the point of chemical release inside the kiln itself. For any consortium or business working on hard-to-abate industrial sectors, Calix brings proprietary process technology that no European competitor currently replicates at the same maturity level.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • LEILAC
    The founding EU pilot that first demonstrated Calix's Direct Separation technology in a real lime and cement manufacturing context, spanning five years and establishing the credibility needed for the follow-on demonstration.
  • LEILAC2
    A six-year Innovation Action (2020–2026) at demonstration scale — the most advanced EU-funded test of the technology, with explicit integration into broader CCUS and CO2 hub frameworks, representing the commercial pre-deployment stage.
Cross-sector capabilities
industrial decarbonization and hard-to-abate sectorscement and lime manufacturing process engineeringCO2 storage and transport infrastructurecircular economy and CO2 utilization
Analysis note: Calix is an Australian company, which is atypical for H2020 — third-country participants without association agreements are generally not eligible for direct EC grants, which explains why all funding figures show as unavailable. Their inclusion in both LEILAC projects is almost certainly justified by their status as the IP holder for the core technology under test. The analysis is limited to two projects in the same series, but those projects are highly coherent and the technology story is clear; confidence is 3 rather than higher purely due to the narrow breadth (one technology, one sector, one project lineage).