SciTransfer
Organization

ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS

US multi-university system providing specialist researchers to European consortia across environmental science, evolutionary biology, astrophysics, and nanomaterials safety.

University system (multi-campus)multidisciplinaryUS
H2020 projects
27
As coordinator
0
Total EC funding
€214K
Unique partners
294
What they do

Their core work

The Arizona Board of Regents is the governing body for Arizona's three public universities (Arizona State University, Northern Arizona University, and University of Arizona), representing a massive US research system with expertise spanning dozens of disciplines. In H2020, their primary role has been providing specialist researchers for European-led staff exchange and mobility programmes (MSCA-RISE), contributing domain knowledge in areas from evolutionary biology and climate economics to astrophysics and nanomaterials regulation. They function as a transatlantic research bridge — European consortia tap into Arizona's faculty and lab infrastructure to access US-based expertise that complements European teams. Their contributions are highly distributed across departments and research groups rather than concentrated in a single lab or institute.

Core expertise

What they specialise in

6 projects

Sustained engagement across GEMCLIME (climate economics), DIAGRASS (dryland ecology), E FUNDIA (Amazonian ecosystems), RECYCLE (pesticide remediation), GOVTROFF (resource governance), and NITRATE (electrochemical water treatment).

Evolutionary biology and mathematical modellingprimary
3 projects

FourCmodelling applied evolutionary game theory to structured populations, ClimAHealth models climate adaptation in human evolution, and UrbPOLS studied urban impacts on wildlife pace-of-life.

Astrophysics and space dynamicssecondary
3 projects

DUSTBUSTERS studies protoplanetary disk formation, Stardust-R covers space robotics and navigation, and HALT investigates hydrodynamical light turbulence.

Humanities and archaeologysecondary
4 projects

ARIADNEplus built archaeological data infrastructure, AGATHOCLES studied ancient Greek pottery techniques, artes EUmanities supported interdisciplinary humanities training, and DIS-ABLED examined disability in medieval Central Europe.

2 projects

GRACIOUS developed grouping and read-across frameworks for nanomaterial risk assessment, and SUNSHINE advanced safe-and-sustainable-by-design strategies for multi-component nanomaterials.

Responsible research and data infrastructureemerging
3 projects

RRI-Practice (their largest funded project at EUR 136,888) studied responsible innovation in organisations, MIDAS integrated health data analytics, and ARIADNEplus networked archaeological datasets across Europe.

Evolution & trajectory

How they've shifted over time

Early focus
Game theory and climate economics
Recent focus
Earth sciences and sustainability

In the early period (2015–2018), Arizona's involvement centred on mathematical and economic modelling — evolutionary game theory (FourCmodelling), climate economics (GEMCLIME), and responsible research frameworks (RRI-Practice). From 2019 onward, the focus shifted markedly toward earth and space sciences (DUSTBUSTERS, HALT, Stardust-R), ecological genomics (DIAGRASS), sustainability governance (GOVTROFF, RECYCLE), and cultural heritage studies (AGATHOCLES). This broadening reflects not a strategic pivot but the nature of a multi-university system where different departments engage independently with European partners.

Arizona's recent projects increasingly address environmental sustainability, ecological adaptation, and safe-by-design materials — suggesting growing appetite for collaborations that connect fundamental science to regulatory and policy outcomes.

Collaboration profile

How they like to work

Role: third_party_expertReach: Global48 countries collaborated

Arizona never coordinates H2020 projects — all 27 engagements are as partner or third party, with 21 of 27 in third-party roles, mostly through MSCA-RISE staff exchange programmes. They operate as a specialist contributor that European coordinators recruit for specific faculty expertise rather than as a project driver. With 294 unique partners across 48 countries, they are an extraordinarily well-connected node but spread thin — each project involves different Arizona researchers rather than a single cohesive team.

An exceptionally wide network of 294 partners across 48 countries, making them one of the most broadly connected US institutions in H2020. Their connections span virtually every European country plus partners in Africa, Asia, and the Americas, driven by the MSCA-RISE mobility model.

Why partner with them

What sets them apart

As a US public university system with three major research institutions under one umbrella, Arizona offers European consortia something rare: a single legal entity that can provide specialist researchers across almost any discipline, from astrophysics to archaeology to nanomaterial toxicology. Their MSCA-RISE track record (10 projects) makes them a proven partner for staff exchange and mobility schemes — they understand the administrative requirements and can host visiting European researchers efficiently. For consortium builders, they are a reliable non-EU partner that adds transatlantic reach without coordination overhead.

Notable projects

Highlights from their portfolio

  • RRI-Practice
    Their highest-funded H2020 project (EUR 136,888) and one of the few where they participated directly rather than as a third party, studying responsible innovation practices across organisations.
  • GEMCLIME
    A long-running project (2016–2022) on climate and energy economics covering CO2 mitigation, consumer behaviour, and renewable energy — their deepest sustained engagement with a single research theme.
  • SUNSHINE
    Their most recent thematic project (2021–2024), contributing to safe-and-sustainable-by-design strategies for advanced nanomaterials — signals a move toward applied regulatory science.
Cross-sector capabilities
environmenthealthfoodspace
Analysis note: Profile is complicated by the multi-university structure: ABOR covers ASU, NAU, and University of Arizona, so the 27 projects likely involve dozens of unrelated research groups. The apparent thematic breadth reflects institutional diversity rather than a single team's range. Most projects show zero EC funding because Arizona participates as a third party (funded by the coordinator's budget), making financial analysis unreliable. Keyword data is sparse for many projects, limiting the evolution analysis.