SAPEA (their largest project at EUR 1.7M) was the core mechanism feeding scientific advice into the EU's Scientific Advice Mechanism, and PERITIA examined trust in expert policy advice.
ALL EUROPEAN ACADEMIES (ALLEA) e.V.
Pan-European federation of academies providing independent scientific policy advice and developing research ethics and integrity standards across 40+ countries.
Their core work
ALLEA is the federation of European academies of sciences and humanities, representing over 50 academies across more than 40 countries. Their core work is providing independent, evidence-based scientific advice to European policymakers and developing ethical standards for research conduct. In H2020 projects, they served as the institutional bridge between the European scientific community and policy processes — coordinating academy networks to deliver expert input on topics from research integrity to the ethics of emerging technologies.
What they specialise in
ENERI built a European network of research ethics committees and integrity offices, while TechEthos developed ethical governance frameworks and codes of conduct.
TechEthos focused on ethics governance for technologies with high socio-economic impact, and PERITIA explored trust, epistemic issues, and behavioural dimensions of policy acceptance.
Both SAPEA and ENERI relied on ALLEA's unique position as a pan-European federation to mobilize academy fellows and research integrity offices across countries.
How they've shifted over time
ALLEA's early H2020 work (2016-2019) focused on building institutional infrastructure — creating networks of research ethics committees, establishing standards for good scientific practice, and feeding structured scientific advice into the EU's policy machinery through SAPEA. Their later projects (2020-2023) shifted toward more conceptual and societal questions: how people trust experts, how emotions shape policy acceptance, and how to govern the ethics of high-impact technologies before they cause harm. The trajectory moves from "building the advisory plumbing" to "understanding why advice works or fails."
ALLEA is moving from process-oriented ethics (standards, networks, codes) toward anticipatory ethics — assessing societal impact of technologies before deployment, making them a relevant partner for responsible innovation projects.
How they like to work
ALLEA has never coordinated an H2020 project — they consistently join as a participant, contributing their unique pan-European academy network rather than managing consortia. With 42 unique partners across 20 countries in just 4 projects, they operate in large, diverse consortia (averaging 10+ partners each). This pattern reflects an organization that brings institutional legitimacy, broad expert access, and policy connections rather than technical project management.
ALLEA has collaborated with 42 distinct partners across 20 countries in only 4 projects, reflecting their role as a network-of-networks that naturally connects to diverse institutions. Their geographic spread is remarkably wide for such a small project portfolio, consistent with their mission as a pan-European academy federation.
What sets them apart
ALLEA's distinguishing asset is that they are not a single research institution — they are the federation representing virtually all European academies of sciences and humanities. This means partnering with ALLEA gives a consortium access to thousands of senior academics across 40+ countries through a single organization. For any project requiring credible, independent scientific input into European policy or ethical governance, ALLEA is one of very few organizations that can deliver that mandate with institutional authority.
Highlights from their portfolio
- SAPEABy far their largest project (EUR 1.7M of their EUR 2.5M total), SAPEA was the scientific advice pipeline feeding directly into the European Commission's Scientific Advice Mechanism — a high-visibility institutional role.
- TechEthosFocused on anticipatory ethics for high-impact technologies, signalling ALLEA's move into forward-looking technology governance beyond traditional research integrity.
- PERITIATackled the politically charged question of public trust in expertise, blending epistemology, behavioural science, and policy — an unusually interdisciplinary scope for an academy federation.